Apex court: T.N. move to convert Secretariat to hospital not illegal

Where the Assembly should function is an executive decision, court cannot interfere: CJI

January 31, 2013 02:01 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 10:31 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of the State secretariat in Fort St. George in Chennai. File photo

A view of the State secretariat in Fort St. George in Chennai. File photo

Observing that the All-India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government’s major policy decision to convert the new Tamil Nadu Secretariat complex to a super-speciality hospital cannot be termed illegal, the Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed an appeal against a Madras High Court judgment refusing to interfere with the decision.

A three-Judge Bench of Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justices Anil R. Dave and Vikaramajit Sen dismissed the petition filed by advocate R. Veeramani, after hearing his senior counsel T.R. Andhyarujina, challenging the High Court verdict. The High Court had upheld the policy decision and dismissed petitions holding that it was purely a matter of internal procedure adopted by the Legislature.

Mr. Andhyarujina said it was not a policy decision but only an administrative decision and the AIADMK government was consistently reversing all the important decisions taken by the previous government without any rhyme or reason. He said already there were two main hospitals — Rajiv Gandhi hospital and Stanley hospital — located within a radius of two km with all facilities of a super-speciality hospital. Therefore, the decision to convert the Secretariat complex to a hospital was tainted with mala fides and politically motivated. He sought a direction to quash the judgment and an interim stay of its operation.

“Where the Assembly should function is an executive decision,” the CJI told counsel. “How are you concerned? It is a policy decision.” When counsel said Rs. 550 crore had been spent on constructing the building, the CJI said the same amount was now being spent for some other purpose.

When counsel drew the attention of the court to the scrapping of the Samacheer Kalvi scheme, the CJI said that was completely different. “You cannot equate the two. That was for a public purpose. From where the Assembly should function is not for the court to decide. It is an executive decision. It can’t be termed an illegality. Special leave petition dismissed.”

The SLP said the High Court failed to consider whether the decision to convert the Secretariat complex to a multi-speciality hospital was tainted with malice in law as a newly constructed seven-storey building for the said purpose was lying in disuse under lock and key without being opened.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.