Today's Paper Archive Classifieds Subscriptions RSS Feeds Site Map ePaper Mobile Apps Social

National » Tamil Nadu

Updated: September 12, 2011 18:40 IST

Anbazhagan’s petition in Jayalalithaa wealth case adjourned to Sep 16

Share  ·   print   ·  
DMK leader K. Anbazagan. File photo
The Hindu DMK leader K. Anbazagan. File photo

The Karnataka High Court today adjourned to September 16 a petition challenging Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption’s decision to conduct further investigation into the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa.

Justice V. Jagannathan, hearing the petition filed by DMK General Secretary K. Anbazhagan, adjourned it for further arguments.

Earlier counsel representing Mr. Anbazhagan submitted that further investigation being carried out was “not for a fair purpose but to aid the first accused (Ms. Jayalalithaa)” and therefore should not be permitted as it lacks bona fides.

He also said plea for further investigation was being done at a “juncture when the trial in the case has been going on for the past 14 years”.

Special Public Prosecutor B.V. Acharya expressed similar contention and submitted “further investigation is justified if fresh facts come to light”.

It was not a fit case for holding further investigation at this stage when Supreme Court has ordered Ms. Jayalalithaa to appear personally on October 20 before the trial court, he contended.

Senior Counsel for the DVAC M.T. Nanaiah however submitted that further investigation was necessary.

The court then adjourned the petition.

Borewell deaths across India
Who should be held responsibile for abandoned borewell tragedies?
Rig owners
Land owners
Law enforcers
Can't say







Recent Article in Tamil Nadu

VCK leader Thol. Thirumavalavan with ‘Podhu’ Dikshithars at the Nataraja temple in Chidambaram.

Thirumavalavan’s temple visit evokes mixed reaction

On April 16, Mr. Thirumavalavan, the DMK-front candidate for the Lok Sabha elections in Chidambaram, was accorded a grand reception by the ‘Podhu’ Dikshithars of the temple. »