EC to hear on ’Two Leaves’ symbol today

Commission has to decide on validity of Sasikala’s election as party’s interim general secretary, claim to symbol

March 22, 2017 12:50 am | Updated November 29, 2021 01:27 pm IST - CHENNAI

The warring AIADMK factions led by jailed leader V.K. Sasikala and former Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam are all set to argue their cases for wresting control of the party before the Election Commission in New Delhi on Wednesday.

The Commission has the task of settling two key disputes. One, whether the appointment of Sasikala as general secretary of the party is in accordance with the AIADMK rules and regulations as amended on February 5, 2007. Two, which of the two factions get to use the party’s popular ‘Two Leaves’ symbol in the Dr. Radhakrishnan Nagar Assembly constituency, where by-election is due on April 12.

Insofar as the first issue is concerned, the party rules alone appear adequate to unambiguously decide on the issue.

Rule of majority

As for the allotment of election symbol is concerned, the Sasikala faction, which currently enjoys majority suppor t from the MLAs, MPs and party district unit office-bearers is contending that the rule of majority must apply. In its representation to the Election Commission, it has referred to the poll body’s decision in the Samajwadi Party case – where a dispute arose between its national president Mulayam Singh Yadav and his son Akhilesh Yadav – in January last.

The faction has cited the Commission’s order, which reads: “In any democratic institution, which the political parties are, the will of the majority should prevail in the internal functioning of the party, and if the majority will is suppressed or not allowed to have a proper expression, it will amount to ‘tyranny of the minority.”

‘Different circumstances’

However, the Panneerselvam faction, in its response, has questioned the applicability of the order in the Samajwadi Party case in the instant dispute.

“The observation of this Hon’ble Commission in the Samajwadi Party case has no application in the present matter as the factual matrix are entirely different. Unlike the present case, the party bylaws weren’t given a go-by as they have been in this case,” it has said.

The faction has argued that since Sasikala’s election as general secretary was in dispute, only Mr. Panneerselvam or Mr. Madhusudhanan, who were appointed party treasurer and presidium chairman respectively by Jayalalithaa, had the powers to authorise the use of the party’s election symbol for contesting in elections.

Their expulsion from the post by Sasikala was bad in law, it was argued.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.