Kudankulam units: Plea seekingscrapping of CRZ nod dismissed

NGT says since SC had already dealt with the issue, it doesn’t have jurisdiction

November 30, 2016 01:17 am | Updated February 19, 2017 08:57 am IST - CHENNAI

Controversy continues:  The reactors at the site of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project in Tirunelveli district. —

Controversy continues: The reactors at the site of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project in Tirunelveli district. —

: The Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal on Tuesday dismissed a petition filed by Poovulagin Nanbargal , a non-governmental organisation that sought the cancellation of the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) nod granted to four units of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (KKNPP).

Disposing of the application, the Bench comprising Justice P. Jyothimani and expert member P.S. Rao said since the Supreme Court in 2013 had already dealt with the issue, the NGT Bench did not have jurisdiction over the case.

Poovulagin Nanbargal had filed an application against the four new units of KKNPP (units 3 to 6)) and challenged the CRZ clearance, arguing that the agency that gave the clearance was not an authorised entity. “Engineers India Ltd is not authorised to prepare consultancy reports for nuclear power plants. The main ground of this case relates to this part,” counsel for Poovulagin Nanbargal had argued.

In 2012, clearance was granted to the units to enable Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) to proceed with the necessary work to start building the plants.

Since the company which did the audit was not an accredited agency as required by law to grant clearances for a nuclear plant, the clearance should be quashed or a fresh review through a competent authority should be carried out, the counsel had said.

NGO to approach SC

Poovulagin Nanbargal intends to move the Supreme Court against the NGT order.

“It is very unfortunate that the NGT has dismissed the petition challenging CRZ clearance given to units 3 to 6, stating that the Supreme Court has dealt with it. We would like to point out that the Supreme Court judgement was only for units 1 and 2 and not for 3 to 6. We had clearly established that the study was done by an unauthorised agency like Engineers India Ltd. We still resolve to appeal in the higher courts. We will leave no stone unturned in bringing out the shortcomings of the project,” G. Sundarrajan of Poovulagin Nanbargal told The Hindu .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.