In a volte face, prosecutor takes back submission on MLAs stay in hostel

Advocates M. R. Elavarasan and V. Preetha habeas corpus petitions.

February 10, 2017 12:36 pm | Updated 09:19 pm IST - CHENNAI

MLA cars are parked inside the MLA Hostel in Chennai on Thursday.

MLA cars are parked inside the MLA Hostel in Chennai on Thursday.

A day after informing the Madras High Court that 130 AIADMK MLAs, whose support V.K. Sasikala claims to have, are “free and safe in the MLAs’ hostel at Chepauk,” the State government made a volte face on Friday and took back its submission. The Public Prosecutor R. Rajarathinam told the court that the information is “incorrect”.

The Chief Prosecutor representing the State government stated that “the submission made before this court on February 9 to the effect that MLAs who are alleged to be in illegal detention are free and staying on their own volition in MLA hostel is incorrect.”

Incidentally, the AIADMK faction led by Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam had alleged that the rival Sasikala camp was holding legislators hostage at a private resort in Koovathur, on the outskirts of Chennai.

Mr. Rajarathinam made the submission when a Division Bench of Justices C. T. Selvam and T. Mathivanan sought to know the MLAs’ actual whereabouts, following the filing of habeas corpus petitions by advocates M.R. Elavarasan and V. Preetha.

The petitioners wanted a direction to the police to trace and produce Kunnam constituency MLA R.T. Ramachandran and Krishnarayapuram MLA M. Geetha who, they alleged, are missing after visiting Chennai on February 8 to attend the meeting of the AIADMK Legislature Party.

Advocate K. Balu, appearing for one of the petitioners, alleged that “20 of the detained MLAs are refusing food and drink owing to their illegal confinement.”

Noting that if it was true, the matter was of serious concern, the Bench said: “However, this court cannot act on the mere say of the counsel. Given the nature of the case, it would only be appropriate to afford the State an opportunity to inform its response.” It then Vasanth KS@Chennai, Staff Reporterposted the plea to February 13 for further hearing.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.