Suspension of Aarakshan screening in U.P. quashed

Reservation is a social issue on which public discussion must be held: court

August 19, 2011 03:29 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 12:34 am IST - New Delhi

Policemen stand guard outside a cinema hall which is screening "Aarakshan" in North Mumbai. File Photo

Policemen stand guard outside a cinema hall which is screening "Aarakshan" in North Mumbai. File Photo

The Supreme Court on Friday quashed the Uttar Pradesh government order, which suspended the screening of Aarakshan for two months, holding that the State had no such power after the censor board had cleared the film.

A Bench of Justices Mukundakam Sharma and Anil R. Dave, allowing the writ petition filed by producer Prakash Jha, rejected the contention that screening of the Hindi film would cause a breach of peace and law and order.

It pointed out that the film had been released all over the country, except in Uttar Pradesh,

Some others “are also sensitive States where it is screened without any difficulty.”

Quoting earlier decisions including the one in the case of the Tamil film Orae Oru Gramathile, the Bench said: “It is for the State to maintain law and order. It shall maintain law and order effectively and meaningfully.”

‘It's a delicate issue'

On the report of a high-level committee, appointed by the Uttar Pradesh government, recommending suspension of Aarakshan as it deals with reservation, the Bench said it “is a delicate issue. It is one such social issue on which public discussion is necessary in a vibrant democracy like ours. Such discussions on social issues would bring about awareness for effective working of democracy. In fact, when there is public discussion and dissent, an informed decision can be taken which is necessary in our society.”

The Bench pointed out that members of the Central Board of Film Certification, along with experts and members of the Dalit community, had seen the film and only after all of them gave positive views on the screening of the movie was it cleared.

As the expert body had found that it could be screened all over the country, the State-appointed committee's opinion favouring deletion of certain scenes amounted to pre-censorship, which power is not available to the State, the Bench said.

Senior counsel Harish Salve appeared for the petitioner, Additional Solicitor-General A.S. Chandihok for the Centre and senior counsel U.U. Lalit for the State government.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.