SC gives six-week protection from arrest to expelled AIADMK MP Sasikala Pushpa

"Why are you keen on her appearance? What is the great hurry? She is a lady MP and not running away," Chief Justice Thakur asks TN counsel.

August 26, 2016 11:53 am | Updated November 17, 2021 02:30 am IST - NEW DELHI

In a measured relief to expelled AIADMK MP Sasikala Pushpa, the Supreme Court on Friday extended her protection from arrest for six weeks, while asking the Tamil Nadu government why they wanted her behind bars.

A bench, led by Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur, on an urgent mentioning by Sasikala's lawyer and senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, questioned the State's eagerness to have her arrested in a case registered by the Thoothukudi police against her and her family members for allegedly ill-treating and sexually abusing two domestic aides.

Ms. Sasikala had moved the Supreme Court against the summons issued to her and other accused persons by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to appear on August 29.

“Why are you keen on her appearance? What is the great hurry? She is a lady MP and not running away,” Chief Justice Thakur asked Tamil Nadu counsel and senior advocate Subramonium Prasad.

The court further said: “the fact that the State is keen on her appearance shows that there is more to this case than meets the eye... that this is all a counterblast against her allegations against you”.

The Bench, however, asked Ms. Pushpa and the accused to comply with the summons and directed the High Court to consider their anticipatory bail applications “uninfluenced by the fact that the Supreme Court has protected her”.

The High Court had directed the MP to appear before it on August 29 and explain how she could have signed a ''vakalat'' in Madurai on August 17, authorising her lawyer C. Susi Kumar to argue the advance bail application on behalf of her, when the police claimed that she did not enter Tamil Nadu ever since the case was registered early this month.

Additional Advocate General B. Pugalendhi had said the joint anticipatory bail application was filed on August 18 as if the accused was present in Madurai. In response, the petitioners’ counsel had sought to withdraw the case.

However, turning down the request, the judge ordered all the accused, including Ms. Pushpa, to be present in the court on August 30 to respond to the allegation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.