SEARCH

News » National

Updated: January 8, 2014 03:12 IST

Supreme Court to hear Kanimozhi’s plea in 2G case on January 21

J. Venkatesan
Comment   ·   print   ·   T  T  
DMK MP Kanimozhi. File photo
The Hindu
DMK MP Kanimozhi. File photo

A Bench of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam and Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Shivakirti Singh fixed the date after senior counsel Abhishek Singhvi made a ‘mention,’ pleading for early listing of the petition filed in July 2013.

The Supreme Court will hear on January 21 the writ petition filed by Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, MP, seeking to quash the charges framed against her by the trial court in the 2G spectrum scam case.

A Bench of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam and Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Shivakirti Singh fixed the date after senior counsel Abhishek Singhvi made a ‘mention,’ pleading for early listing of the petition filed in July 2013.

In the petition filed by advocate Joseph Aristotle, the daughter of the former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, M. Karunanidhi, said the Supreme Court granting a stay, on a CBI application, on all proceedings in the Delhi High Court resulted in violation of her fundamental right under Article 21. A Bench headed by Justice G.S. Singhvi (since retired) later upheld the CBI’s action.

Ms. Kanimozhi said the restraint order curtailed her fundamental right to contest baseless charges through a quash petition, so she was constrained to file the writ petition.

Ms. Kanimozhi said she was one of the directors of Kalaignar TV for a mere two weeks, from June 6 to 20, 2007. She resigned much before the launch of the TV channels and she had not signed any cheque on behalf of the company or received any monetary benefit. Further, she was only a 20 per cent minority shareholder, and a shareholder could not be saddled with criminal liability for acts of commission and omission of the company.

She said the allegations made against her pertained to the financial transactions made between December 2008 and August 2009 — after more than 18 months of her resignation.

The prosecution documents itself would show that she had no role in the operations of the company, especially in relation to the transfer of Rs. 200 crore, or its repayment. Nor was she a beneficiary of the loan transaction.

More In: National | News
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Lakhvi, who was the operations commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, was charged along with six others in 2009 in the Mumbai attack case.

Lakhvi’s detention orders suspended

The notification detaining Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the key planner of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, under a public security orde... »