Supreme Court stays release of Rajiv case convicts

The court order is restricted to Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan as the Centre’s application is for restraining the State government from releasing them.

February 20, 2014 11:06 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:26 pm IST - Chennai

The three convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case — Santhan, Murugan and G. Perarivalan alias Arivu — are seeking commutation of their death sentence to life imprisonment citing delay of over 11 years in deciding their mercy petitions by the President. File photo

The three convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case — Santhan, Murugan and G. Perarivalan alias Arivu — are seeking commutation of their death sentence to life imprisonment citing delay of over 11 years in deciding their mercy petitions by the President. File photo

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Tamil Nadu government not to release till March 6, 2014 three convicts whose death sentence was commuted by it to life term on Tuesday in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

Though the State government decided to free seven convicts in the case, the court order is restricted to Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan as the Centre’s application is for restraining the State government from releasing them. Indications are that the Centre will file an application on Friday to stop the release of Nalini, Robert Payas, Jayakumar and Ravichandran.

The Bench, after hearing Solicitor-General Mohan Parasaran and senior counsel Rakesh Diwedi for the Tamil Nadu government, who pleaded with the court not to pass any stay order, issued notice to the State, Inspector-General of Prisons, Chennai, and Superintendent of the Central Prison, Vellore, besides the three convicts. The Centre and the State were directed to maintain status quo.

Mr. Parasaran told the court that only the Centre could grant remission, and the Tamil Nadu government had not followed procedure.

Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam observed, “When death is converted to life and remission is granted, authorities have to give special reasons. Our judgment was available at 5 p.m. on the Net on Tuesday. But the Tamil Nadu government took the decision on Wednesday morning. We are not expressing any views. We are not underestimating the powers of the State. We are concerned with the procedural lapses and we will examine it.”

In its February 18 judgment, the court said, “Life imprisonment means end of one’s life, subject to any remission granted by the appropriate government under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which, in turn, is subject to procedural checks.” The Centre said it should be examined whether the Centre or the State was the right government to grant remission.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.