Supreme Court stays proceedings against Setalwad

July 29, 2011 02:24 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:57 am IST - New Delhi

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed criminal proceedings against social activist Teesta Setalvad for her alleged role in a case of exhuming the bodies of post-Godhra riot victims in 2006 at Pandarwada in Gujarat.

A bench of justices Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha also issued notice to the Gujarat government seeking its response to Ms. Setalvad’s plea for quashing the criminal proceedings against her.

She had approached the Apex Court against the May 27 order of the Gujarat High Court refusing to quash the First Information Report (FIR) registered against her.

Mr. Setalvad had moved the High Court in May for quashing the FIR registered against her at a police station in Panchmahal district of the State in connection with exhumation of the bodies from Pandarwada and surrounding villages in Khanpur taluka from a graveyard near river Panam in Gujarat.

The High Court, however, had quashed the summons issued to her terming her as absconding. It observed that by showing Ms. Setalvad as an absconding accused in the charge sheet filed in April, “a glaring mistake has been committed by the investigating officer”.

The FIR had alleged that Ms. Setalvad, who had earlier secured anticipatory bail from a local court in Panchmahal district, was the prime conspirator behind the incident.

Ms. Setalvad was implicated in the case by one of her former close aides Rais Khan who was associated earlier with her civil society organisation - Citizen for Justice and Peace (CJP).

Mr. Khan had alleged that the bodies were exhumed at the instance of Ms. Setalvad.

It was alleged that in 2002 about 28 unidentified bodies of the riot victims from Pandarwada and surrounding villages of Khanpur taluka of the district were buried in a graveyard near river Panam there.

After over four years, Rais Khan, who was then associated with CJP, and 12 others exhumed these bodies without prior permission of the government.

Following this a criminal complaint was registered, but the investigation began only last year, as the accused had obtained stay on probe from the Gujarat High Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.