Supreme Court reserves order on Nupur’s plea

May 16, 2012 06:15 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 03:36 am IST - New Delhi

Ghaziabad: Nupur Talwar being taken to a jail after she was produced in a CBI court in Ghaziabad on Wednesday in connection with the twin murder case of her 14-year-old daughter Aarushi and domestic help. Her husband Rajesh Talwar, out on bail, is also seen in the picture. PTI Photo by Atul Yadav (PTI5_16_2012_000065A)

Ghaziabad: Nupur Talwar being taken to a jail after she was produced in a CBI court in Ghaziabad on Wednesday in connection with the twin murder case of her 14-year-old daughter Aarushi and domestic help. Her husband Rajesh Talwar, out on bail, is also seen in the picture. PTI Photo by Atul Yadav (PTI5_16_2012_000065A)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its order on dentist Nupur Talwar’s plea seeking a review of its order of allowing her criminal prosecution in the twin murder case of her daughter Aarushi and domestic help Hemraj.

A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and J.S. Khehar reserved the order after hearing extensively the contentions of Ms. Talwar and the CBI.

In a last-ditch effort to convince the Supreme Court to review its order, the dentist pleaded she was not asking for a clean chit in the murder case but wanted a direction to the CBI to reinvestigate the case.

Fourteen-year-old Aarushi was found dead with her throat slit at her Noida residence on the intervening night of May 15 and 16, 2008, while Hemraj’s body was recovered from the terrace of the house the next day.

Aarushi’s mother is now in judicial custody while her father Rajesh Talwar is out on bail. The case for their trial in the twin murder case is pending at a Ghaziabad sessions court.

The Supreme Court Bench had earlier termed as “premature” the arguments of Nupur for quashing of proceedings against her on the basis of alleged lacunae in evidence in the twin murder case.

It had also said the magistrate, who ordered Nupur’s prosecution, should have exercised restraint while passing the order. It asked why the magistrate had passed such an extensive order which on some issues was not in conformity with the evidence in the case.

The CBI, however, had justified the order saying there is noting wrong in giving the reasoning for dismissing the closure report in the case and to prosecute the Talwars.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.