Subrata moves SC challenging his detention

March 12, 2014 10:59 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:09 pm IST - New Delhi

The apex court bench headed by Chief Justice P. Sathasivam said that it will hear the matter at 2 p.m. on Wednesday after the same was mentioned by senior counsel Ram Jethmalani. File photo: V. Sudershan

The apex court bench headed by Chief Justice P. Sathasivam said that it will hear the matter at 2 p.m. on Wednesday after the same was mentioned by senior counsel Ram Jethmalani. File photo: V. Sudershan

In a new twist in Sahara-SEBI case on the issue of refund of investors’ money, Subrata Roy on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court challenging its order for detaining him for not depositing Rs. 20,000 crore with the market regulator.

Appearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani pleaded that the court should give an urgent hearing in the case as it pertains to Habeas Corpus.

A writ of Habeas Corpus is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee before the court to determine if the person’s imprisonment or detention is lawful.

Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Mr. Roy, submitted that “there is some defect which needs to be cured urgently” and pleaded the court to hear him at 2 p.m.

The bench said it will hear the case after lunch if the application filed by him gets numbered by the Registry.

The Sahara chief and his two directors Ravi Shankar Dubey and Ashok Roy Choudhary were sent to judicial custody on March 4 by a special bench of justices K S Radhakrishnan and J S Khehar for not depositing the amount of Rs 20,000 crore with SEBI.

On the last date of hearing on March 7, the apex court had asked the Sahara group to come out with “honourable proposal” for depositing Rs 20,000 crore of investors money and posted the hearing on March 11.

The matter was then posted for hearing on March 11 but the case got adjourned with no date of further hearing specified.

The special bench had earlier expressed unhappiness over the proposal of Sahara on the refund of investors’ money.

It had rejected Sahara’s proposal which had offered to pay Rs 2,500 crore within three days and the rest of the amount in five instalments by the end of July, 2015.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.