SG: I quit to protect dignity of my office

I resigned only to protect the dignity of the office, he says

July 11, 2011 01:14 am | Updated November 17, 2021 01:31 am IST - New Delhi:

NEW DELHI, 08/05/2010:  Solicitor General, Gopal Subramanium during the Bar Association of India's Golden Jubilee National Conference on "Law and Governance'' in New Delhi   on 08, May , 2010.  Photo:S.Subramanium

NEW DELHI, 08/05/2010: Solicitor General, Gopal Subramanium during the Bar Association of India's Golden Jubilee National Conference on "Law and Governance'' in New Delhi on 08, May , 2010. Photo:S.Subramanium

Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam, who felt slighted by Communications Minister Kapil Sibal's decision to engage a lawyer to defend him in the Supreme Court, met President Pratibha Patil on Sunday and explained the circumstances under which he tendered his resignation.

Mr. Subramaniam, who was with the President for about 45 minutes, thanked the government for a “splendid innings.” The visit was described as a courtesy call.

The Solicitor-General told The Hindu that he felt it was not proper for the government to engage a private lawyer when he was appearing in the 2G case. “I resigned only to protect the dignity of the office.”

As per Mr. Sibal's decision, senior advocate Rohinton Nariman would represent him on Monday before a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly in the wake of an affidavit filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, which alleged that he favoured Reliance Telecom in the levy of penalty.

Informed sources said that though Mr. Sibal engaged Mr. Nariman only in his individual capacity, the notification for his appointment was given by the Law Ministry.

Speaking to The Hindu from Bangalore, Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily had said: “I will speak to Mr. Gopal Subramaniam on this issue on my return to Delhi.” He did not elaborate.

Right thing: J.S. Verma

The former Chief Justice of India, J.S. Verma, told The Hindu that Mr. Subramaniam had done the right thing by resigning when he felt that the government did not treat him with dignity. A competent and credible law officer, Mr. Subramaniam had reasons to feel hurt when the file (on 2G case relating to Mr. Sibal) was taken away without his consent.

When it was pointed out that already senior advocate K.K. Venugopal has been appointed to represent the CBI in the 2G case, Justice Verma said ordinarily whenever another lawyer was appointed to represent a case, the government should take the law officer into confidence. But in this case, this was not done. “It is unfortunate that good people had to leave because the government is not treating them with dignity and respect. Both Mr. Subramaniam and Mr. Nariman are very fine gentlemen and extremely good lawyers, but I feel sad that they are pitted against each other by the government, thereby demeaning the office of Solicitor-General,” Justice Verma said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.