SC stays death penalty of couple in human sacrifice case

August 20, 2017 09:31 pm | Updated 09:42 pm IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 18/02/2014: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. Photo: V. Sudershan

NEW DELHI, 18/02/2014: Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. Photo: V. Sudershan

The Supreme Court has stayed the execution of a couple, sentenced to death in a case of sacrificing a two-year-old boy.

A Bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra admitted the appeal filed by the condemned prisoners, Ishwari Lal Yadav and his wife Kiran Bai, whose death penalty was confirmed by the Chhattisgarh High Court in the human sacrifice case.

“Let the lower court records be called for. There shall be stay of the execution of the death sentence. Let the matter be listed before the appropriate bench in the week commencing November 28,” the Bench, also comprising Justices Amitava Roy and A.M. Khanwilkar, said.

The case dates back to November 23, 2010 when Chirag, the two-year-old son of Poshan Singh Rajput, went missing while playing outside his house in Ruabandha area of Chhattisgarh’s Bhilai Nagar.

It was alleged that the two main accused, Yadav and his wife, used to practice black magic. Kiran Bai had allegedly asked her husband to get a small child for sacrifice and the boy was kidnapped and allegedly killed in a gruesome manner.

The family members of the boy and other neighbours heard loud music from the Yadavs’ house. On suspicion, they entered the house and found blood stains, bowls of blood and chopped body parts in a room, the prosecution had alleged.

The child’s body, which was buried in the room, was recovered following the Yadavs’ interrogation.

A case was lodged for the offences of murder, kidnapping in order to murder, causing disappearance of evidence and other provisions of IPC against 12 people, including four minors. Eleven persons, including the Yadavs’ children, were nabbed.

The trial court had sentenced the couple and five others to death for the crime. The Chhattisgarh High Court had confirmed the death penalty of the couple but reduced the sentence of the co-convicts.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.