SC rejects anticipatory bail to Teesta, but stays arrest till April

The couple had approached the apex court against the order of the Bombay High Court which had given them only interim protection for four weeks.

February 24, 2014 04:25 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 10:42 am IST - New Delhi

Bangalore:Karnataka:13/07/2013:Indian Civil rights activist Teesta Setalvad  at a talk  on "Civil Society and current challenges to a united India" which was organised by  Coalition for One Nation on 13th July 2013.    Photo:V Sreenivasa Murthy

Bangalore:Karnataka:13/07/2013:Indian Civil rights activist Teesta Setalvad at a talk on "Civil Society and current challenges to a united India" which was organised by Coalition for One Nation on 13th July 2013. Photo:V Sreenivasa Murthy

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to grant anticipatory bail to social activist Teesta Setalvad and her husband Javed Anand but extended interim protection from arrest till March end in a case lodged against them in Ahmedabad for alleged embezzlement of funds.

The couple had approached the apex court against the January 31, 2014 order of the Bombay High Court which had given them only interim protection for four weeks till February 28, 2014 with a direction to approach the Gujarat High Court for anticipatory bail.

Ms. Setalvad and her husband have been booked by the Crime Branch of Gujarat Police on the charges of cheating, breach of trust under the IT Act, in a matter related to construction of “Museum of resistance” in Gulbarg society in Ahmedabad which was hit by communal riots in 2002.

“We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the Bombay High Court. However, we extend the interim protection from February 28 to March 31. The petitioners can file petition in Gujarat High Court for anticipatory bail which has to be heard independently without being influenced by the observation made by the Bombay High Court,” a bench comprising justices S.J Mukhopadhaya and Kurian Joseph said.

The bench said it will be open for the Bombay High Court to go into the question of law that whether anticipatory bail can be entertained in the cases registered in different state.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.