SC panel to inspect Rathore’s Gurugram flat

Lawyers’ committee will look into allegations concerning parking facilities, kuccha road etc.

November 10, 2016 02:31 am | Updated December 02, 2016 02:29 pm IST - NEW DELHI

New Delhi: Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore MoS for I & B ministry at a function to launch the Mobile Application of DD News, E-version of India 2015 & Bharat 2015 and E-book of the Ministry, in New Delhi on Thursday.   PTI Photo by Kamal Kishore (PTI5_7_2015_000035A)

New Delhi: Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore MoS for I & B ministry at a function to launch the Mobile Application of DD News, E-version of India 2015 & Bharat 2015 and E-book of the Ministry, in New Delhi on Thursday. PTI Photo by Kamal Kishore (PTI5_7_2015_000035A)

: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed a two-member lawyers’ panel to inspect the facilities at the flat of Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore in Parsvnath Developers’ Exotica project in Gurugram.

A Bench of Justices Dipak Misra and Amitava Roy formed the lawyers’ committee after Mr. Rathore’s counsel complained that the flat, which the apex court had earlier directed the real estate firm to hand over to him, was “uninhabitable”.

The court directed the committee to submit its report in two weeks and look into the allegations made by the MoS.

Amenities not provided

Counsel for Mr. Rathore said the flat, which was allotted to him, did not have access to common facilities of the project, as was shown in the site map at the time of booking.

While the tower in which the flat is located had a kuccha access road that opened into a slum cluster, there was no parking facility. The tower did not have an occupancy certificate, he said.

“The members of the committee will go and inspect what is the shortest and longest route to the common facilities that everyone is getting. It will also look into allegations concerning parking facilities, kuccha road etc.,” the Bench said.

Mr. Rathore had booked a flat in Parsvnath’s Exotica project in Gurgaon in 2006. The firm was to deliver the flat in 2008-09.

In January this year, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directed the builder to refund the principal amount with interest and compensation to him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.