SC order on reservation gets flak in Lok Sabha

August 05, 2013 02:31 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 07:06 am IST - New Delhi

A view of Supreme Court of India. File photo; V. Sudershan

A view of Supreme Court of India. File photo; V. Sudershan

The recent Supreme Court judgement on reservation on Monday came in for criticism in the Lok Sabha with members claiming that it would hit hard 80 per cent population of the country comprising SC, ST and Backwards.

The judgement disallowing reservation in promotion in the faculty of AIIMS also saw members expressing concern over the erosion of Parliament’s supremacy and demanding urgent amendment to the Constitution to annul the apex court verdict.

Raising the issue during Zero Hour, JD(U) chief Sharad Yadav lamented that the courts have been repeatedly striking down legislations which are meant to benefit weaker sections.

He said while the judiciary was doing a good work in exposing corruption, it was negating the laws unanimously passed by all parties on social issues like reservation.

“They always do something so that Parliament does not run,” Mr. Yadav said regretting that the Constitution Bench had passed the order on the last day of the tenure of Chief Justice Altamas Kabir, who retired recently.

The matter of concern was that this apex court order was not just applicable to the AIIMS but on all such institutions.

“Reservation is a hard-earned achievement of the people after a long struggle. Some way should be found by the government to restore the rights of 80 per cent of the people of the country,” Mr. Yadav said.

Seconding the JD(U) leader, Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav sought to know whether the people of weaker sections were “only meant to sweep the floors or be a chaprasi or a chowkidar.”

He said there were only two per cent people in high posts among the backward classes, who constitute 54 per cent of the population.

The SP chief also warned of nationwide protests if the government did nothing to annul the Supreme Court order.

Dara Singh Chauhan (BSP) said the situation would not have arisen if Parliament had passed the Reservation in Promotion Bill which was being strongly advocated by BSP supremo Mayawati.

P.L. Punia (Cong) said it was a matter of regret that the Supreme Court had not considered several important decisions taken by Parliament to give justice to weaker sections through reservation.

“Will only five people (bench of the apex court) decide the future of the country or the representatives sitting in Parliament,” he asked.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.