Supreme Court notice to Centre, Delhi government on Kejriwal dharna

January 24, 2014 01:01 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 06:01 pm IST - New Delhi

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal

Observing that the issue of whether the Chief Minister of a state along with his cabinet colleagues can hold a dharna on the streets in support of his demand raised an important constitutional issue, the Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre and the Delhi government.

A Bench of Justices R.M. Lodha and Shivakirti Singh, acting a writ petition filed by advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, issued notice after Mr. Sharma submitted that the question that arose in the petition was whether “law makers could themselves become law breakers.” The Bench granted six weeks for the respondents to file their response.

Justice Lodha observed “every institution {including the office of Chief Minister} is a product of the Constitution, which is supreme. Every person who holds constitutional office is governed by the Constitution. We will examine the issue.”

In his petition Mr. Sharma raised important questions of law viz whether a Chief Minister /Minister holding constitutional office could become a street agitator against the constitutional systems at the same time; whether Chief Minister /Minister could make a demand other than through permitted constitutional means; whether they have any legal authority to act as a police to raid / detain any women in the midnight; and whether they could violate constitutional provision breach the oath of office /secrecy by staging the dharna on the road; whether Chief Minister /Minister is liable to be removed or not for the unconstitutional/misbehavior/criminal offence of I.P.C ; whether interference/ obstruction by Chief Minister to protect an accused criminal of (Section 509-B of IPC) during investigation does not attract 166-A of IPC against him?

The petitioner also drew the court’s attention to the vigilantism of Delhi Law Minister Somnath Bharti and his associates in rounding up some African nationals for medical tests on suspicion of being involved in "drug and sex racket" and said this action had attracted widespread condemnation but the Chief Minister had gone on record in support of him. This action raised an important question whether the Minister could take law into his own hands.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.