SC backs victim's parents' protection plea in road rage case involving Manipur CM's son

Ajay Meetai, son of Chief Minister N. Biren Singh, was awarded a five-year jail term for firing and killing Roger in March 2011

May 29, 2017 03:04 pm | Updated December 03, 2021 05:10 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Irom Chitra Devi and her husband Irom Lokendro Singh. V.V.Krishnan

Irom Chitra Devi and her husband Irom Lokendro Singh. V.V.Krishnan

The Supreme Court on Monday prima facie  backed allegations of victimisation made by parents of a youth who died in a road rage involving the son of Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh.

“Nobody makes this kind of allegations against the Chief Minister unless there is some kind of substance in them,” Justice A.K. Sikri, who is leading a Vacation Bench, also comprising Justice Deepak Gupta, observed orally.

Irom Chitra Devi, mother of victim Roger, had moved the Supreme Court , fearing for their lives and alleging continued harassment by the State.

Appearing for the mother, advocates Kamini Jaiswal and Utsav Bains, said the parents are in hiding in the national capital and wanted security by Central forces.

Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh submitted that the government is evaluating the situation.“We have already written to them [Manipur government]. We will evaluate the situation and act accordingly. However, there is no urgency in this case,” he said.

Counsel for the Manipur government submitted that the State itself is prepared to provide security to the victim's family.

Ajay Meetai, son of the Chief Minister, was awarded a five-year jail term for culpable homicide for firing at Roger and causing his death. Roger had not allowed Meetai's vehicle to overtake him, which led to a confrontation on March 20, 2011. The State had not appealed the decision.

Ms. Jaiswal said the odds are so stacked against the parents that no lawyer in the State was even ready to appear on their behalf before the Manipur High Court in an appeal against the awarding of the five-year jail term to Meetai.

The parents have asked the court “to provide security for the safety of the life and liberty of petitioners and their family members against any kind of threat and victimisation for their peaceful stay throughout India”.

They have also sought a direction for an independent probe by a Central agency on the ground that the State police were working at the behest of the convict.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.