SC directs Samsung chief to appear in court

The case relates to his failure to pay to the tune of 1.4 million US dollars to a complainant

April 02, 2014 02:44 pm | Updated May 21, 2016 07:44 am IST - New Delhi

A complaint was filed by JCE Consultancy, against Samsung chief in Ghaziabad court for allegedly having been cheated of $1.4 million. File photo shows Samsung's electronic shop in Seoul, South Korea.

A complaint was filed by JCE Consultancy, against Samsung chief in Ghaziabad court for allegedly having been cheated of $1.4 million. File photo shows Samsung's electronic shop in Seoul, South Korea.

The Supreme Court has asked the Chairman of Samsung company Lee Kun Hee to appear before a trial court in Ghaziabad within six weeks in connection with a case relating to his failure to pay to the tune of 1.4 million US dollars to a complainant.

A Bench of Justices C.K. Prasad and Pinaki Chandra Ghose, passed this order while dismissing his special leave petition seeking to quash the non bailable warrant in a criminal case filed against him and pending before a court in Ghaziabad.

The Bench, however, said “the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner shall not be executed for a period of six weeks. In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall appear before the trial court and seek bail and/or exemption from appearance in accordance with law.” The Bench said it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case pending before the trial court.

A complaint was filed by an Indian company, JCE consultancy, against Mr. Lee in the Ghaziabad court for allegedly cheating it to the tune of $1.4 million. As the applicant and other co-accused persons did not appear before the trial Court on Feb. 3, 2005 bailable warrants were issued against the applicant and other co-accused persons. Thereafter, on March 16, 2005, the Court issued non-bailable warrants (NBW) against the applicant and other co-accused persons, to be executed through the CBI and sent to Interpol for issuing Red Corner notice for their extradition.

Their revision petitions and appeals to the Allahabad High Court and Supreme Court were dismissed. Thereafter the complainant pleaded before the trial court for execution of the NBW and necessary orders were issued. Again the petitioners approached the Allahabad High Court which called the Samsung Chairman an absconder and fugitive and dismissed the appeal. The present appeal before the apex court was directed against this order dated May 30, 2013.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.