SC bans use of pet coke in National Capital Region

Fines Environment Ministry for not fixing emission norms

October 24, 2017 09:21 pm | Updated 09:21 pm IST - NEW DELHI

AGRA, NEW DELHI, 17/12/2014: Taj Mahal at Agra, a symbol of love, continues to attract visitors, both young and old in Uttar Pradesh. 
Photo: R. V. Moorthy

AGRA, NEW DELHI, 17/12/2014: Taj Mahal at Agra, a symbol of love, continues to attract visitors, both young and old in Uttar Pradesh. Photo: R. V. Moorthy

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the prohibition of industrial use of pet coke and furnace oil in NCR regions from November 1, 2017. The order follows the recommendation of the Supreme Court-appointed Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA) to ban the sale, distribution and use of furnace oil and pet coke in the NCR. Their use is already prohibited in Delhi.

A Bench led by Justice Madan B. Lokur also imposed a fine of ₹2 lakh on the Ministry of Environment for not fixing any emission standards for industries using pet coke and furnace oil in the NCR region.

Casting its net wider against sources of air pollution and government apathy after recently cracking down on the sale of firecrackers during Deepavali, the Supreme Court said fixing emission norms for industries using these toxic materials was vital for public health.

‘Lethargy, laziness’

The delay on the government’s side, the court said, was symptomatic of “lethargy and laziness.”

Snubbing the Ministry for submitting draft norms only on October 23, the court said failure from the Ministry’s side to pay the ₹2 lakh fine would invite serious penalties.

In a separate hearing, the same Bench, led by Justice Lokur, ordered the demolition of a high-tech, multi-parking lot built a kilometre from the Taj Mahal. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is expected to visit the monument on October 26 to review tourism schemes. The court gave the authorities four weeks to demolish the parking lot.

Later in the day, counsel for the U.P. government sought a recall of the order, but the court asked her to move an appropriate restoration application. The order came on a PIL petition filed by advocate M.C. Mehta for protection of the monument from pollution and deforestation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.