Rotomac fraud case: CBI arrests Vikram Kothari and his son

Mr. Kothari’s wife, Sadhana, is also an accused in the FIR that was registered on February 18 following a complaint by the Bank of Baroda.

February 22, 2018 09:15 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 07:55 am IST - NEW DELHI

 Vikram Kothari

Vikram Kothari

The CBI on Thursday arrested Rotomac Global Private Limited promoter-director Vikram Kothari and his son in the alleged ₹3,695-crore “wilful” loan default case . They have been accused of cheating a consortium of seven nationalised banks.

The father-son duo was being questioned by the investigating team for the past two days at the CBI headquarters. Mr. Kothari’s wife, Sadhana, is also an accused in the FIR that was registered on February 18 following a complaint by the Bank of Baroda.

Diversion of funds

As alleged, since 2008-09, Mr. Kothari’s companies had taken a loan of ₹2,919 crore from a consortium led by Bank of India and comprising Bank of Baroda, Indian Overseas Bank, Union Bank of India, Allahabad Bank, Bank of Maharashtra and Oriental Bank of Commerce.

However, it is alleged, the directors cheated the banks by diverting funds so raised in conspiracy with certain bank officials. “There are instances where the credit sanctioned and disbursed to the company was used for purposes other than execution of the claimed export orders,” a CBI official had earlier said.

The FIR also cites a case in which the credit sanctioned for an export order purportedly received from Singapore for supply of wheat was diverted to another company named Bargadia Brothers Private Limited (Singapore). “The money was later remitted back to the account of Rotomac Pen, which amounts to round-tripping,” said the official.

Another modus operandi was to use the loans, disbursed on proposals for procurement of goods meant for exports, for undeclared purposes. In such cases, no export orders were allegedly executed by the company. It amounted to misappropriation, criminal breach of trust and violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, alleged the agency.

The agency has also alleged that most suspect transactions of the company were with a limited number of buyers, sellers, sister concerns and subsidiary companies.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.