Riots charges against Modi based on lies: Jaitley

January 07, 2014 06:59 pm | Updated June 13, 2016 07:57 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Ahmedabad: Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley at the release of the party manifesto ahead of Assembly elections, at a press conference in Ahmedabad on Monday. PTI Photo (PTI12_3_2012_000086A) *** Local Caption ***

Ahmedabad: Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley at the release of the party manifesto ahead of Assembly elections, at a press conference in Ahmedabad on Monday. PTI Photo (PTI12_3_2012_000086A) *** Local Caption ***

The charges levelled against the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, in the 2002 riots are based on “falsehood,” Arun Jaitley, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said on Tuesday.

In a statement issued here, Mr. Jaitley said it was now time to put to rest “propaganda” against Mr. Modi as the “falsehoods” about the Godhra train fire, his reported remarks that the 2002 riots were a reaction to it and alleged orders to let Hindus vent their anger have been “exposed and rejected”.

He also dismissed the findings of the Justice U.C. Banerjee Committee report by describing it as “scandalous”.

“The report alleged that the fire could have started inside the compartment. This report carried no credibility with the people and has been consigned to the dustbin. The judicial verdict proved every fact of this report to be false,” Mr. Jaitley said. There was evidence that compartment number six of the Sabarmati Express was set on fire. “A fraudulent attempt was made by a section of the media and certain NGOs to allege that nobody set the fire from outside; that the fire started inside the compartment,” he said.

Mr. Jaitley also rubbished claims that Mr. Modi in an interview had described the riots as the reaction to an action.

“Mr. Modi maintained that he had not given any such interview. The Gujarat government wrote to the newspaper alleging that no such interview had been given since nobody from the newspaper had ever met him. The statement was not published in the next 20 days. Thereafter, it appeared as a letter in the Letters to the Editor column with a clarification that in fact no reporter had met Modi or had interviewed him.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.