In what may provide a further boost to investor sentiments at home and abroad, the Central Government, on Monday, maintained that there was no reason why addressing issues pertaining to retrospective amendment of income-tax laws should wait till the budget session in February next year.
To a query at the Economic Editors’ Conference here on whether a decision on the retrospective tax issue would have to wait till the budget for the next fiscal, Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said: “Once we take a view [on the Shome Committee report], I see no reason why we should wait for the budget session. We should move whatever changes have to be brought about in Parliament as early as possible”.
Shome panel
The Parthasarathi Shome committee was asked to recommend measures to deal with retrospective amendment of income-tax laws and suggest ways of treating taxation cases which involve indirect transfer of Indian assets, of the likes of the Vodafone-Hutchison deal in 2007.
Among other things, the Shome panel was also told to examine taxation of non-resident transfer of assets — where the underlying asset is located within the country — in the context of FIIs (foreign institutional investors) operating in India purely for portfolio investment and all non-resident investors. The committee submitted its final report to the Finance Minister last week.
“The Shome Committee report on retrospective legislation is under examination, and we would have to complete that examination quickly and take a view,” Mr. Chidambaram said while pointing out that the Finance Ministry, after taking the stakeholders’ comments on the report, would decide whether an amendment to I-T Act was necessary or if there were any other ways to resolve the matter.
“Resolution of the tax disputes, both pending and anticipated, is good for the country, good for the economy and good for investments. So, we must find ways to resolve the issue,” he said.
PTI reports:
'FDI will benefit economy, country'
Cautioning that absence of economic reforms will slow down growth, the Finance Minister said political parties may oppose but should not obstruct decision-making.
“Every government is entitled to lay down policies. Opposition to policies is legitimate, obstructionism is not,” Mr. Chidambaram said while addressing the annual Economic Editors’ Conference.
“The government of the day must be allowed to lay down policies, pass legislations wherever necessary, and get on with the job of implementing those policies,” he added.
Noting that these were challenging times, the Minister said, “Without reforms, we risk a sharp and continuing slowdown of the economy, which we cannot afford given the imperative need to generate jobs and incomes for a large population, most of whom are young.”
India’s economic growth during 2011-12 slipped to nine-year low of 6.5 per cent and during the first quarter of the current fiscal it was 5.5 per cent.
Expressing confidence that with requisite savings and investments India’s economic growth rate will recover to 8 per cent and more, and perhaps touch 9 per cent, the Minister said, “We should keep that rate of growth as our objective and progress towards achieving that objective.”
“Long standing structural reforms required to achieve high investment and high growth rates have been held back because of many reasons.
“Among them are the needs to forge a consensus on reforms, the practical necessity to garner support across the political spectrum to pass legislation... Nevertheless we are now addressing the difficult areas of reforms”, he added.
Referring to the government decision to allow FDI in multi-brand retail, Mr. Chidambaram said, “We must not fear foreign investments in India. We have the sovereign right to decide where and how foreign investments would be allowed into India.”
The decisions to allow foreign investment should not be tested on the basis of undefined ideology or theory, but on a clear-headed assessment of the advantages that would accrue to India, he said.
“I have no doubt...FDI in retail, aviation and FM radio broadcasting is decisions that will benefit the economy and the country,” he added.
Chidambaram also underlined the need for containing inflation and said that appreciating value of the rupee would help in brining down the cost of imported crude, petroleum products and fertilisers.
“The value of rupee is an important factor that affects the value of imports. A depreciating rupee will also impact trade and investment. Hence, the need to stabilise the exchange rate. I believe that we have met with moderate success,” the Minister said.The other important task before the government was to contain fiscal deficit, he said, adding, “No one will have confidence in the Indian economy if there is uncertainty about the fiscal stability of the country.”
Keywords: FDI in retail, Indian economy, Finance Ministry, Chidambaram









There are certain things that hurt the poor in this country, and hurt the country also in the process.
1. Their addiction to freebies from the political class hurts the poor the most. In an economy where real inflation is far more than the one presented by the government, rice at one rupee will take you only so far. The real point is that government spending causes RBI to create new money causing runaway inflation. The poor must be the first to ask the government to stop doling out frebies to themselves and to rich industrialists. Let everyone pay for what they use.
2. If the government manages money allocated to welfare, uninterested bureaucrats and politicians siphon the money off and it does not reach the beneficiaries. A better scheme is to fund charities to provide welfare linked to skills improvement programs intended at promoting self-sufficiency.
3. Law (Courts) and Order (Police) illtreat the poor. Reforms making law and order accessible is essential to our progrss.
It is not the question of obstruction of Govt.policies - in case, the
pension fund lost its value at the time of retirement, will
Mr.Chidambaram comes to rescue - no, by the time, he will be somewhere
else. Even in U.S. at the time of recession, the pension fund lost its
value by more than 30%. Mere statistics will not work, Mr. Chidambaram.
" If the prices are not competetive they will buy from abroad"-
stupid.
If the prices are not competitive why should they buy from india and
pass the excessive cost to the consumer? Clear your head mister, who
is going to pay price for protectionism ? You, and the person being
protected! Its better to avoid any nationalist sentiments and go for
hard core realism. That is there is a heavy price for protecting
anyone, and that price is paid by govt(you) and including the party
being protected.
PM and Finance Minister must be aware of the Corruption thrived in all
spheres of administration supported by vested interests to elude from
regulations that stands for statutory compliances protecting national
interests. The government could not become a precursor to display a
paradigm for virtuous governance which the corporate sector including
MNCs and Public sectors to follow. The corruption culture thrives in
all sorts of business transactions. Money ceaselessly flows to
different pockets which should have otherwise gone to the exchequer!
Is it impossible to contain fiscal deficit under these circumstances?
Mr Chidambaram, follows the Goebells principle, repeat the Lies ten
times to make it look like true .
Can he explain in simple terms how it will benefit the FARMERS?
Walmart& Carrefour will not go to villages & buy Directly from
Farmers. If the prices are felt not competitive they will buy from
abroad, crushing local market.
FM broadcasting!!!! FDI can go for extensive advertisements- only major source of income to FM radio station LOOT & take the money out of INDIA? Also dump unwanted foreign culture as free compliment. Aviation – We are already drained off by all foreign airlines. Air Arabia/Emirates/Aletihad/Qatar airlines/Kuwait airlines—ALL were never there. At that time AirIndia/Indian Airlines were making merry. You opened gates –They are all earning-Airindia/ Indian are NOT. Still you want FDI here & sell these two/Kingfisher etc?
Advocating for FDI is similar to advocating for subcontracted ARMY .
May be one day they will do that too.
Instead thinking this way, the minister could think not his party or
alliances not doing any scam which inturn makes Indian economy higher.
As a citizen I can make a note here that I am very much ashamed of this Government.
Please Email the Editor