Reddys to remain in jail

The prosecution had earlier submitted that former Karnataka Minister Gali Janardhana Reddy and his brother in-law Srinivas Reddy did not cooperate with the CBI during their six-day custodial interrogation.

September 30, 2011 07:53 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 12:41 am IST - Hyderabad

Former Karnataka Minister Gali Janardhana Reddy is brought to Chanchaldua Central Prison after CBI court send him to 14 days judicial custody in Hyderabad. File photo

Former Karnataka Minister Gali Janardhana Reddy is brought to Chanchaldua Central Prison after CBI court send him to 14 days judicial custody in Hyderabad. File photo

A Special CBI Court today dismissed the bail pleas of former Karnataka Minister Gali Janardhana Reddy and his brother-in-law B.V. Srinivas Reddy, arrested in connection with alleged illegal mining activities.

Judge B. Naga Maruthi Sarma also dismissed the agency’s petition which sought custody of both the accused for nine more days.

Mr. Janardhana and Mr. Srinivas are in judicial remand till October 3 and lodged at the Chanchalguda Central Prison here.

The CBI, probing illegal mining and irregularities in allotment of leases to Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC), had arrested Mr. Janardhana and Mr. Srinivas, who is Managing Director of the company, on September 5 from Bellary in Karnataka.

Earlier, seeking further custody of the Reddys, the prosecution submitted that during the six-day custodial interrogation of the accused (from September 13), both of them did not cooperate with the CBI, which posed several questions related to the illegal mining activities.

The agency also contended that it wanted to probe details of foreign ‘benami’ companies where Mr. Janardhana (a director of OMC) made and received investments by exporting iron ore and where the Reddys kept the proceeds from the illegal mining.

The CBI argued that the Reddys had exclusive knowledge of facts of the case and only they can provide information about who they conspired with in carrying out the illegal mining and whom they “bribed” to get permits for transfer of the illegally excavated iron ore.

Opposing the CBI plea, the defence counsels argued the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) did not permit police custody beyond the first 15 days of the arrest of an accused.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.