SEARCH

News » National

Updated: November 13, 2013 02:45 IST

Probe agencies overstepping their limits, says Chidambaram

    Devesh K. Pandey
    Gaurav Vivek Bhatnagar
Comment (1)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Finance Minister P.Chidambaram with CBI Director Ranjit Sinha at the Central Bureau of Investigation's International Conference on 'Evolving Common Strategies to Combat Corruption and Crime' in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: R.V. Moorthy
Finance Minister P.Chidambaram with CBI Director Ranjit Sinha at the Central Bureau of Investigation's International Conference on 'Evolving Common Strategies to Combat Corruption and Crime' in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: R.V. Moorthy

A day after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked police agencies to exercise caution while probing executive decisions, Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram censured law enforcement bodies and the Comptroller and Auditor General on Tuesday for “overstepping their limits” and attempting to convert bona fide executive decisions into cases of crime or abuse of authority.

“I would caution investigating agencies to respect the line that divides policy-making and policing. An offence is committed when a prescribed rule of conduct is violated. If there is no prescribed rule, or if there is no violation of a prescribed rule, there is no offence,” said the Finance Minister.

He was addressing the Central Bureau of Investigation’s three-day conference on “Evolving Common Strategies to Combat Corruption and Crime.”

It was not the business of the investigating agency to lay down or presume a rule of conduct. “Even where a rule has been prescribed, if there is a policy behind that rule, it is not the business of the investigating agency to question the wisdom of that policy or to suggest a different policy that would be better in the view of the investigating agency,” he said. The investigating agency must confine itself to the question whether there has been a violation of a laid-down rule.

Mr. Chidambaram said the principle of strict liability may not apply without qualification to financial crimes, except in a few cases where the law unambiguously stipulated that violation of the rule would be considered an offence.

There were cases where the CBI — and sometimes courts — had interpreted provisions of the law to exclude mens rea. “Ordinarily, a financial crime would arise from either unlawful gain or unlawful loss and in such cases the law could either stipulate proof of the state of mind or presume a state of mind to cause the unlawful gain or unlawful loss. So, in financial crimes, mens rea or the state of mind must be invariably proved or presumed from certain facts.”

Bid to gag CBI, says BJP

The BJP criticised the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister for “trying to gag the CBI” and “issuing veiled signals to the judiciary.” It said the Congress-led UPA government could not perpetuate fraud and impropriety in the name of policy making. “The UPA government sold the scarce 2G spectrum in 2008 at the rate prevailing in 2001. The UPA built corruption into a policy and is now arguing that the CBI should not investigate policy issues,” said party national spokesperson Prakash Javadekar.

He alleged that the UPA government went ahead with arbitrary allocations of 17 billion tonnes of coal reserves worth Rs. 50 lakh crore to over 140 private companies by deliberately delaying the auction bill.

More In: National | News

In summary, leave the government alone!

from:  Raj N
Posted on: Nov 12, 2013 at 14:04 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Portable PF account number to be launched on October 16

Retirement fund manager Employees Provident Fund Organisation’s ambitious project to provide portable Universal Account Numbers (UAN) to... »