Myanmar’s opposition leader and Nobel laureate Daw Aung San Suu Kyi met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Wednesday and discussed a variety of issues, including the national reconciliation process under way in her country and the process of democratisation in this context.
At the half-hour meeting, Dr. Singh expressed his happiness in receiving Ms. Suu Kyi and appreciated the progress made by her and President Thien Sien.
Dr. Singh praised Ms. Suu Kyi for her “indomitable” courage and unwavering resolve for democracy in Myanmar. “Our good wishes are with you as indeed with your struggle for democracy. We admire you for the indomitable courage you have shown,” he told her.
At the meeting, which was held without the presence of aides, the leaders agreed for need to have greater cooperation between the parliaments and judiciaries of the two countries.
Giving details of the meeting, senior government officials said the Prime Minister and Ms. Suu Kyi also agreed that people-to-people relations were important.
Later in the day, delivering the Nehru Memorial Lecture on the 123rd birth anniversary of the former Prime Minister, Ms. Suu Kyi spoke about the influence of Indian leaders, including Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, the principles that guided India’s freedom struggle and how they inspired her as she continues to strive for a democratic Myanmar.
“These past few months have given me many opportunities to thank people, governments, and organisations for support to the democracy cause in Burma. Today I wish to thank you for the Jawaharlal Nehru memorial prize that was given to me in 1995 when I was released from the first term of my house arrest,” she began.
Dressed in a yellow and purple traditional Burmese dress with yellow flowers arranged in her hair, Ms. Suu Kyi said the thoughts and actions of leaders of the Indian independence movement inspired the movement in Burma and that their pro-democracy movement was firmly based on non-violence.
Reflecting on her memories of Jawaharlal Nehru, she said she remembered him more as a father figure to her parents and little as a statesman. “To my infant mind he was the kindly old man who provided my father two sets of uniforms, the smartest that he had,” she said, narrating the story of how her father Aung San had stayed with Nehru as his personal guest while on his way to London to negotiate Burmese independence.
Throughout her speech, Ms. Suu Kyi linked Nehru’s experiences to her own and reflected on the part of their lives that were spent as political prisoners.
Counting the milestones in her life, she recalled reaching Oxford for higher education the same year as Nehru died, being placed under house arrest for the first time the year of his birth centenary, grappling with the predilections, uncertainties and dilemmas the same way as he did when he was incarcerated.
Talking of her house arrest, the pro-democracy leader said among the ‘maps’ that used to see her through the years that headed into the unknown were Nehru’s autobiography and ‘Disovery of India’ and quoted what she learnt about “law and order” from Kalhan’s Rajtarangini, the 12th century historic chronicle of kings in Kashmir.
The chairperson of the National League for Democracy has spent nearly 15 years under house arrest.
“During the years of house arrest, I felt closer to those who I could identify with politically, intellectually, spiritually through their thoughts, even if they were complete strangers or figures of the past, than to those whom I know personally,” she said adding she had deep appreciation for Indian leaders who became her deepest friends.
Ms. Suu Kyi also spoke of her ties to India, where she received her education and the time she spent as a fellow at the Indian Institute of Advanced Studies between 1987 and1988 with her husband.
Congress president Sonia Gandhi described Ms. Suu Kyi as a synthesis of the best of East and West, but rooted in her own country and its culture, just like Nehru. “She exemplifies all qualities he [Nehru] most admired — fearlessness, integrity, moral and intellectual courage, perseverance, freedom from anger and bitterness and unqualified devotion to betterment of the life of her people through the path of dialogue and national reconciliation,” she said.







the speech which she gave yesterday at nehru memorial lecture function was really a gem. Such glaring example of how spiritual fabric of any leaders should be finely interwoven in his or her political endeavours. If humanity ever has any hope it's because of leaders like her. Alas, India is so shorn of such sagacious leaders. No wonder then, why world's largest democracy couldn't stand for it's self professed values in it's backyard..
A lady who stands for democracy and had to suffer for having belief in it is here in India. The foreign policy adopted by India to Myanmayar was wrong. India who believes in democracy recognized the Junta Government which is contradicatory to its belief. People of India have been supporting Ms.Suu.Kyi, but its government did otherwise. Let us hope that Ms.Suu Kyi has made the Indian government realise their mistake and regret for what they have done. Being a woman I would ask Ms. Suu Kyi to continue to fight for freedom and for the emergence of democracy as soon as possible in Burma.
The article talks about Dr. Manmohan Singh, but the photograph shows
only Mrs,Sonia Gandhi. That shows our own power struggle.
"Ms. Suu Kyi linked Nehru’s experiences to her own and reflected on the part of their lives that were spent as political prisoners"
There can be precious little linkage between Nehru's experience and her's. Nehru's struggle was against the British rule, her struggle, to say the very least, was with the British support.
Indian government and the president of the indian national congress deserve praise for
inviting the popular Burmese leader to India at this juncture. She was elected to hold a
High post in Burma, but she could not exercise her right, even with the strong backing of
The people there. India due to variety of reasons, could not go to her rescue, and
considering the attitude of those at the helm of affairs in Burma, she is still not really free.
The prime minister of India, the coalition parties in power and the opposition should think
Together on this issue to enable her to play a meaningful role In future. This is a sensitive
Issue and India should be in the forefront to help her through diplomatic channels for the
Success of democracy.
Beautiful photograph; captures the mood of Aung San Suu Kyi brilliantly. I commend
Ms. Suu Kyi's relentless struggle for democracy in Burma. However, I wonder what
kind of democracy she wants for Burma and more particularly where it should lead
Burma and the people. Democracy has many faces. One of them is ordinary people
versus the powerful, as we see in India and in many democracies including in the US.
How Ms. Suu Kyi will avoid this ugly face of democracy that promotes and even
protects crony capitalism? In her mission to establish democracy in Burma, Ms. Suu
Kyi does not seem to pay much attention to the economic vision of Burma. This may
cast a shadow over her political vision in the long run.
Aung San Suu Kyi, one of the living legend and icon of democracy for
the whole world, had started her struggle for freedom incidentally on
one of our Independence anniversary, on 15th August,1988 by sending an
Open Letter to the Burmese military which was running savage regime
after the resignation of General Ne Win on 23rd July,1988. The General
was the Dictator since 1962. She formed her Party NLD (National League
for Democracy) on 24th September, 1988. It became history that despite
the house arrest in July, 1990, San Suu Kyi could bring victory to NLD
82% of Parliamentary constituencies and was elected as Prime Minister.
It was a different storey that the SLORC (State Law and Order
Restoration Council) refused to recognize the landslide victory of NLD
in the said election.Unfortunately in her prison days India had pretended as if we are
unaware of Juntas style of hiding military power under a civilian
facade. The regime had pulled back Burmese people to the darkness of
19th century despotism and even posed challenges to foundations of
democracy practiced around the globe. But why India did maintain a
sort of disinclination even to air an opinion against the despotic
regime in the neighborhood? If Indian foreign policy is for upholding
democratic establishments with no discrimination on any race or
religion, we should have put an end to the dodging of our propriety
and democratic entity to caution against atrocities happening at
Myanmar.
For many years India had kept aloof from the Myanmar issue and never
took any initiative for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi. It was
unpardonable that we did not utilise our presence as a guest in ASEAN
forum! Our great Economist Amartya Sen had sobbed for the then Indian
stand on Myanmar which he voiced as an ignominy to our basic
institution of democracy.
Now Aung San Suu Kyi has come to India; can India change its stand at
least now while there is head way for democracy in Myanmar? India
should not disregard the fact that once the erstwhile Burma was a
province of the British India until 1937 when it was granted a
different colony status with a new constitution calling for a fully
elected assembly.
Please Email the Editor