Villagers restart protest against stone-crushers

They had ended the earlier protest after DM’s intervention

December 27, 2014 12:00 am | Updated 08:29 am IST - Dehradun:

After a failed 42-day long protest against the installation of stone crushers in the Maletha gram sabha, the villagers have restarted their protest to demand a government order against the usage of stone crushers in the agriculturally-rich region.

On August 13 this year, the villagers started protesting against the installation of four stone crushers in the Maletha gram sabha in Tehri district. The protest continued for 42 days and it ended when Tehri District Magistrate Yugal Kishore Pant gave orders for the stone crushers to stop operations in the area.

However, the stone crusher operators approached the Nainital High Court and in a recent order the High Court dismissed the District Magistrate’s orders.

“The Court said that the permission for the stone crushers to operate was given by the State government, so the District Magistrate does not have the authority to stop the work,” Mr. Pant said.

On December 22, the villagers again began their protest against the operation of stone crushers in their gram sabha. Head of the Maletha gram sabha Surveer Singh Bisht said: “The land was barren but it was made agriculturally productive by the efforts of Madho Singh Bhandari in the 16th century. The dust from stone crushers would destroy agriculture which is an important source of income here.”

Mr. Bisht said the area was of immense historic importance and the crushers would destroy it. “There is also fear of health hazards from the dust that the crushers will produce,” he said.

Villagers fear the eventual migration of the population of about 9 villages in three gram sabhas that would be affected by the crushers.

Sameer Raturi of the Himalaya Bachao Aandolan, which is supporting the protest said: “We have decided to go on an indefinite fast if the State government does not order for cancellation of operation of stone crushers within two weeks.”

A recent High Court order dismissed the District Magistrate’s order saying it was not his prerogative

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.