SP silent on Hashimpura acquittals

Six days after the verdict, there has been no reaction from the party headed by a leader dubbed ‘Maulana’ Mulayam.’

March 27, 2015 03:10 am | Updated November 17, 2021 02:12 am IST - Meerut:

A muslim woman who lost her children in the Hashimpura massacre in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.  Photo: S. Subramanium

A muslim woman who lost her children in the Hashimpura massacre in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. Photo: S. Subramanium

The ruling Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh has maintained a conspicuous silence on the Delhi trial court verdict in the Hashimpura massacre case.

The court last week acquitted all the 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary personnel accused of abducting and killing 42 Muslims in the Hashimpura area in Meerut on May 22, 1987.

In the aftermath of the judgment, several Muslim and civil society groups urged the Akhilesh Yadav government to appeal against the acquittal. On Thursday, BJP leader Subramanian Swamy too asked the government to challenge the order.

But six days after the verdict, there has been no reaction from the party headed by a leader dubbed ‘Maulana’ Mulayam.’ Sources within the party have told The Hindu that it was precisely this ‘pro-Muslim’ image that it wanted to discard. They said the SP was in dilemma on the stand it should take. It was closely watching the reaction of the minority community and studying the political repercussions that its stand could trigger. Official spokesperson Rajendra Chaudhary said the party would react only after “properly” studying the judgment.

Interestingly, even Azam Khan, the prominent Muslim face of the SP government known for his controversial statements, has said nothing. Another prominent Muslim face in the ruling party and an MLA from Meerut, Shahid Mazoor, has neither visited Hashimpura nor contacted the victims.

“Nobody from either the Uttar Pradesh government or the Samajwadi Party has tried to reach out to us,” a survivor of the massacre Zulfiqar Nasir told TheHindu . The victims are planning to file an appeal in the Delhi High Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.