M.P. ranks low on RTI performance review

October 30, 2009 08:21 pm | Updated 08:21 pm IST - Bhopal/New Delhi

Madhya Pradesh ranks sixth in Overall Public Satisfaction (OPS) according to a performance review of Information Commissions and Commissioners carried out by the National RTI awards Secretariat.

Analysing orders passed in 51,128 cases by information commissioners and benches across India during 2008, the first of its kind study has ranked commissions and commissioners on several criteria, including effectiveness, Deterrent Impact(DI), Pro-Disclosure Factor(PDF) and OPS.

M.P. ranks low on almost all indicators of the study conducted by a unit of Magsaysay awardee Arvind Kejariwal’s Pulic Cause Research Foundation. At 31%, the State Information Commission (SIC) ranks sixth on the OPS list, while one of its Commissioners Mahesh Pandey, ranks 11th. Karnataka tops the list with 55% OPS, while West Bengal is at the bottom with an OPS of 6%.

Other Commissioners from the MPSIC rank 24th (D.C.Jugran), 30th (P.P.Tiwari) and 41st (Iqbal Ahmed). Interestingly, Mr. Pandey, a former journalist with BBC and Jansatta, is the only one from a non-bureaucratic background.

With 40% effectiveness, M.P. ranks 7th on the effectiveness scale. Even here, Mr. Pandey, with 51% effectiveness, ranks higher than his colleagues at the SIC. Again, Karnataka, along with Kerala, tops the list with 60% effectiveness, while West Bengal is at the bottom with 8% effectiveness.

In terms of DI rakings, M.P. bagged an abysmal 20 rank with a DI of 0.2%. The DI is a measure of “exactly how scared officials are of the RTI act” or in how many cases of willful non-disclosure or deemed refusal, was a penalty levied on an official. The list is topped by Mizoram with a DI of 25%.

PDF ranks commissions based on how many pro-disclosure orders they passed. Here M.P. ranks 7th with a PDF of 89%, while interestingly, neighbouring Chhattisgarh ranks 2nd with a PDF of 95%.

Interestingly, the Central Information Commission as well as the Central Information Commissioners fared quite badly in the analysis, with Chief Information Commissioner Wajaahat Habibullah being the only saving grace with a rank of 4 on the effectiveness indicator (63%).

Seven of the Central Information Commissioners are at the bottom of OPS indicator, while the commission itself ranks 16th. Similarly, in effectiveness, the commission ranks 18th.

The states of Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and Sikkim could not be made a part of the survey.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.