National » Other States

Updated: January 21, 2012 02:32 IST

Hindrance alleged in gathering information on Supriya Sule

Staff Reporter
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Supriya Sule
Supriya Sule

A day after trial started in the Bombay High court seeking to determine whether Supriya Sule, Member of Parliament and daughter of Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar, owed adherence or allegiance to a foreign country, an application was submitted alleging hindrance in collecting information due to unfair influence.

The applicant, Mrunalini Kakade, claimed that the information sought from sources was not being furnished because of Ms. Sule's father who “is a highly influential person with the government agencies.” The application filed in the court stated that a request was sent to the Councillor officer of the Singapore Consulate in Mumbai and the Emigration and Check-point authorities in Singapore but both claimed to be “unable to accede to the request” of providing information about the citizenship of Ms. Sule. The application also demanded that the Singapore Consulate be asked to produce oral evidence and documents with respect to the case.

The initial petition stated that Ms. Sule's election be declared null and void, as she was a non-Indian after acquiring citizenship of Singapore by buying property there. On Thursday, during cross-examination by Ms. Sule's advocate, Ms. Kakade told the court that she had had no documentary evidence to show that Ms. Sule personally owned immovable properties in a foreign country adding that she had proof to show that Ms. Sule's husband Sadanand owned properties.

Ms. Sule had previously sought dismissal of the petition that demanded her disqualification from election with regard to dispute over her citizenship. The High Court dismissed her application in December 2011 saying that the Central government had decided that Ms. Sule was an Indian citizen and had not acquired citizenship of Singapore, but it (the government) had not decided whether she owed adherence or allegiance to any foreign country. According to Singaporean law, a person has to be a citizen of that country to be able to purchase property.

Keywords: Supriya Sule


Supriya steals the show at rallyOctober 28, 2012

Murthy is correct. The Hindu's Singapore correspondent would be able to verify or expand on it. However, as a Permanent Resident (PR) of Singapore, Sule could own property like thousands of other Indian (NRI) PRs do. There is nothing magical about that. Sule also probably operates or operated "Laguna International Pte Ltd" company in Singapore along with Sadanand Sule. This seems to be a true fact, and one which The Hindu's Singapore correspondent Mr Suryanarayana would be able to easily and thorougly verify. Copies of all company business registration documents are purchasable from and apparently delivered within 3 to 4 days. I suggest that some investigative media pick up the thread.

from:  Lim Chin Chye
Posted on: Feb 1, 2012 at 21:14 IST

According to Singaporean law, a person has to be a citizen of that country to be able to purchase property - Factually untrue. Permanent Residents are allowed to buy residential properties(Private Condo and unsubsidized HDB ). Also foreigners can own private Condos. Landed property ownership is restricted to Citizens.

from:  VSK Murthy
Posted on: Jan 27, 2012 at 13:06 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor





Recent Article in Other States

2 more farmers end life in U.P.

Despite repeated assurances of help from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav, suicides by farme... »