SEARCH

National » Other States

Updated: April 30, 2011 02:51 IST

Gujarat withdraws security for Sanjiv Bhatt

Manas Dasgupta
Comment (3)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt. File Photo: PTI
PTI
IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt. File Photo: PTI

The Gujarat government on Friday withdrew the security cover for senior IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, leaving a lone armed guard at his disposal. This despite his repeated pleas for enhancing security for him and his immediate family members.

The security cover was withdrawn even as the G.T. Nanavati-Akshay Mehta judicial inquiry commission, probing the Godhra train carnage and post-Godhra communal riots in 2002, decided to question Mr. Bhatt on May 16 “in camera” in the judges' chamber.

Mr. Bhatt, who created a flutter last week by submitting an affidavit in the Supreme Court accusing Chief Minister Narendra Modi of having adopted an anti-minority stance during the riots, has written several letters to Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Balwant Singh seeking security cover.

The former Additional Director-General of Police, R.B. Shreekumar, also wrote to the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) to ensure adequate security for Mr. Bhatt as he was a key witness in the case filed before the Supreme Court based on the petition filed by Zakia Jaffrey, wife of the former Congress MP, Ehsan Jaffrey, who was among those killed in the Gulberg Society massacre.

But instead of providing the “Y category” security, which Mr. Bhatt claimed that the State Intelligence Bureau and the Ahmedabad police recommended for him after a threat perception assessment recently, Director-General of Police Chittaranjan Singh ordered withdrawal of the official vehicle and the driver allotted to him and sent back the five armed guards Mr. Bhatt had deployed at his Ahmedabad residence from the State Reserve Police Training College, Junagadh, of which he was Principal.

Mr. Singh told journalists that an armed guard from the Ahmedabad police had been posted at his residence “round the clock” as required under the Supreme Court's order to provide security to all witnesses called by the SIT.

The DGP claimed that Mr. Bhatt was on “unauthorised leave” and had been “absent” from his place of posting in Junagadh. Officially, the police could provide him protection only at his place of posting and his official residence in Junagadh. Only an armed guard personally attached to him could be taken anywhere with him, Mr. Singh said. The DGP, in his letter to Mr. Bhatt, said, “As per the government rules, since you are unauthorisedly absent, deploying manpower from the training college is a gross violation of the rules.”

Challenges claim

Mr. Bhatt, however, challenged Mr. Singh's claim that he was “unauthorisedly absent” and shot off a letter accusing him of “continuing to take pro-active steps to jeopardise” his and his family's security “by repeatedly ordering withdrawal of his official vehicle and security.”

In his letter, Mr. Bhatt claimed that he was on a month's leave earlier and on March 19 he resumed duty duly informing the DGP. “I deposed before the SIT on March 21 and since have been instructed by the SIT to stay put in Ahmedabad since they could summon me again. That is why I have not left Ahmedabad.” He wondered why, after a month of his returning to Ahmedabad and staying there put at the behest of the SIT, the DGP found him to be on “unauthorised leave.”

Manch's objection

Meanwhile, the Jan Sangharsh Manch, which had moved an application before the Nanavati–Mehta commission to summon Mr. Bhatt for cross-examination, objected to the commission's decision to hold the proceedings “in camera.”

Mukul Sinha, advocate for the Manch, which represents riot victims before the commission, said he would oppose the move. “They cannot keep the media out of this when the entire enquiry is happening in the public domain.”

If congress allows impartial enquiry , india will get all black money , CWG scam money , Nuke deal money , 2g scam money and many like those back for public utility.

from:  SD
Posted on: May 23, 2011 at 21:42 IST

If BJP allows impartial enquiry, the Modi could be sitting behind bars. Modi is wearing a mask and luck is in his favour as the people of the state believed him and voted to power. Having done all mischief, he has to show that he is best adminstrator and stick to power. One day, he is out of power, the truth will come out.

from:  Pradeep
Posted on: May 1, 2011 at 01:02 IST

We have seen many hindi movies where honest police officers are being hounded for speaking truth and here in real life it is happening! Pray Sanjiv Bhatt and his family remain safe. He is a post graduate of IIT and honest but unfortunately, Indians dont need such quality officers it seems! Sad day!

from:  Mohamed Ghouse
Posted on: Apr 30, 2011 at 09:07 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Mumbai

Kolkata


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Other States

A November 2014 photo of Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav with JD (U) president Sharad Yadav after a luncheon meeting of various opposition leaders at Mr. Mulayam’s residence in New Delhi.

No time can be fixed for merger of parties: Sharad Yadav

Janata Dal (United) president Sharad Yadav on Saturday said the proposed December-22 ‘Mahadharna’ in New Delhi would be the “first solid... »