Before polls were called, Gujarat pushed terror Bill

Union Home Ministry has sent it for consultations again

October 28, 2017 09:31 pm | Updated October 29, 2017 12:33 am IST - New Delhi

 Ram Nath Kovind

Ram Nath Kovind

Days before the Gujarat Assembly elections were announced, the State government renewed its bid to revive the controversial Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill, 2015, which authorises police officers to tap phones and submit the conversations as evidence in court. The Bill includes provisions to file a charge sheet within 180 days instead of the usual 90 and proposes stricter conditions for granting bail.

Inter-ministerial review

The Union Home Ministry has sent the Bill for inter-ministerial consultations, the fifth time since it was first conceived in 2003 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat.

Former President Pranab Mukherjee had refused to clear the Bill, following which the Home Ministry recalled it in January 2016. The Ministry asked the State government for clarifications, and Gujarat had sent a fresh proposal this September.

The earlier GUJCOC Bill was reintroduced as GCTOC Bill in 2015. The same year the Information and Technology Ministry objected to the provisions that allowed “authorisation of interception of telephonic conversations and their admissibility as evidence in the court of law”. As per norms, agencies such as the Research & Analysis Wing (RAW), the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, the Enforcement Directorate and the police can tap phones only with the permission of the Union Home Secretary.

“Some minor changes were suggested by the Home Ministry and they have been complied with,” a senior Gujarat government official told The Hindu .

Once the consultations are done, it will be sent to President Ram Nath Kovind for his assent.

The Bill in its earlier form was rejected thrice by two former Presidents — the late A.P.J. Abdul Kalam in 2004 and by Pratibha Patil in 2008 and 2009.

One of the provisions to which objections were raised by the Centre was Section 25, which provided immunity to the State from any legal action for “anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act.”

While reintroducing the Bill in 2015, Gujarat Home Minister Rajnikant Patel said the legislation was required for the safety and security of the residents of Gujarat, as it shared a border with Pakistan.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.