Art of Living hints at approaching Supreme Court against NGT order

Displays satellite images to refute allegations that its three-day event damaged the Yamuna floodplains

June 08, 2016 12:00 am | Updated September 16, 2016 11:29 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Troubled waters:The foundation has deposited Rs.4.75 crore with the DDA as directed by the NGT for damaging Yamuna’s biodiversity during its ‘World Culture Festival’ in March.File Photo

Troubled waters:The foundation has deposited Rs.4.75 crore with the DDA as directed by the NGT for damaging Yamuna’s biodiversity during its ‘World Culture Festival’ in March.File Photo

The Art of Living Foundation on Monday refuted the allegations that its three-day mega event had damaged the Yamuna floodplains and hinted that it may approach the Supreme Court against the National Green Tribunal’s order, which asked it to pay Rs.5 crore as compensation.

The foundation has deposited Rs.4.75 crore “environment compensation” with the Delhi Development Authority as directed by the NGT for damaging Yamuna’s biodiversity during its ‘World Culture Festival’ in March.

Subjudice matter

Noting that the matter was subjudice with the NGT, the Art of Living experts said they are yet to present their evidence to the Tribunal.

“Our legal team is studying the NGT order. The Supreme Court is on vacation. We will soon take an appropriate step,” the Art of Living’s spokesman Kedar Desai told reporters here.

The foundation's legal and environmental experts even displayed satellite images and photographs to claim that no environmental damage was done to the Yamuna floodplains.

The Art of Living claimed that there has been no scientific assessment of pre and post situation of the floodplains till now.

“There is no scientific assessment of the pre and post situation at Yamuna floodplains where World Culture Festival was held. The judicial process is on and if we win, the money (Rs.5 crore) will be returned to us,” Mr. Desai said.

Environment consultant Prabhakar Rao showed a 1986 survey of India map and claimed that the allegation of damage to wetland along the Yamuna was “wrong” since no such wetland existed there.

Charge of damage

He also refuted other allegations of change of land form at Yamuna floodplains and damage to local biodiversity, showing satellite images and site photographs of flora and fauna.

“The charge of damage to Yamuna floodplains is not correct since the World Culture Festival’s core venue was spread over just 24.44 acres,” he said.

The allegations of damage to land form through construction of roads and ramps and levelling of floodplains were also dismissed by Mr. Rao.

“The area where the event was held was under cultivation of vegetables since at least a decade. So it was already levelled and we did not undertake much levelling. It was also alleged that we constructed road and ramps but a 2007 image showed that those were constructed during an event organised by a media house that year,” he claimed showing a 2005 satellite image.

Mega stage

The much talked-about mega stage constructed over 7 acre of land was also designed so as to cause minimum compaction on the floodplains even though it incurred higher costs, he claimed.

The foundation expressed disappointment over the controversy surrounding the World Culture Festival, saying even foreign countries were interested in hosting the event.

“Even while the World Culture Festival was going on, we were invited by three countries, including Australia, to hold such an event there.

“It feels bad. As a country we should have felt proud about the event, which saw participation of people from 155 countries,” Mr. Desai said.

“Judicial process is on and if we win, the money (Rs.5 crore) will be returned to us,” Mr. Desai said

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.