A poor man’s battle for information

The RTI Act, whilst continuing to be the boon for many in this country, is also a poisoned chalice for some.

September 07, 2009 07:23 pm | Updated 07:28 pm IST - CHHATTARPUR:

In a blow to the Right to Information (RTI) Act, a man belonging to the below-poverty-line (BPL) category was asked to pay Rs. 9,000 for information which he sought. The real shocker, however, is that even after paying the amount, Vijaypal Nishad is yet to receive the information.

According to the Act, an appellant is required to pay for photocopies of the information sought— known as the cost of information.

However, under sub-section (1) of Section 6 (Rs.10 fee and cost for obtaining information); sub-section (1) of Section 7 (Rs.2 for each page created or copied); and sub-section (5) of Section 7 (Rs.50 for information provided in diskette or floppy or Rs.2 per page of the photocopy for extracts from publications), appellants belonging to the BPL category are exempt from this rule (provided necessary documents are produced in support of their claim). And information has to be provided free of cost.

Nishad, a resident of Kasera village under Virampura panchayat in Bakswaha block, possesses an Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) card as proof of his poverty. Only the poorest of the poor are eligible for the card.

On February 6, 2008, Nishad sought information on the work done by his village panchayat in the last five years.

After being denied information by panchayat officials, he approached the Janpad Chief Executive Officer on March 20, 2008, who scheduled a hearing on the matter nine days later. The CEO, R.G. Manavi, however, did not seem to be fully aware of the situation. “I have heard about such a case, but I am not completely sure,” he said.

After the hearing, the panchayat secretary demanded Rs. 9,385 for the information Nishad sought. On May 17, 2008, Nishad made the payment against a receipt (a copy of which is with The-Hindu ).

More than a year later, he is yet to receive the information he sought and paid for. He continues to face intimidation from the panchayat officials, all of whom belong to the same family.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.