No timeline for ‘standing tribunal’ on water disputes: Govt

In a written reply in the Rajya Sabha, Water Resources Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad said the proposal to set up a ’standing tribunal’ to adjudicate inter—state river water disputes is at a "conceptual stage."

February 10, 2014 04:42 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 07:18 am IST - New Delhi

The Union Government on Monday said that it has not fixed a time line to take a final call on replacing all existing inter—state water dispute tribunals with a permanent body to settle such matters.

In a written reply in the Rajya Sabha, Water Resources Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad said the proposal to set up a ’standing tribunal’ to adjudicate inter—state river water disputes in consultation with stakeholders, including states is at “conceptual stage.“

“No time line has been fixed,” he said.

The Minister also said five water disputes referred to tribunals under the Inter—State River Water Disputes Act of 1956 are yet to be settled.

The Ravi and Beas Tribunal set up in April, 1986 to settle dispute between Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan gave its report and decision in April, 1987. But a Presidential Reference in the matter is before the Supreme Court.

In April, 2004, to settle a dispute between Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, the Krishna Water Dispute Tribunal II was set up. It gave its final report in November last.

But as per a Supreme Court order of September, 2011 the decision of the panel cannot be published in official gazette following references filed by the Centre and the State Governments.

The Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal to settle water dispute between Andhra Pradesh and Odisha was established in February, 2010. It is yet to give its report.

The Mahadayi Tribunal to settle dispute between Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra in November, 2010 is also to come out with its award.

The Cauvery Tribunal of June, 1990 gave its final award six years ago which was notified in February last year involving dispute between Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Pudducherry. But the States have filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.