No mining in States, Union Territories without Centre’s nod: SC

March 01, 2012 07:35 pm | Updated August 02, 2016 09:21 am IST - New Delhi

File photo of a mine in Bellary district of Karnataka. Photo: Special Arrangement

File photo of a mine in Bellary district of Karnataka. Photo: Special Arrangement

Expressing concern over growing illegal mining in the country, the Supreme Court has ruled that States and Union Territories can now grant leases for mining minor minerals in less than five hectares or renew them only after prior approval from the Union Environment Ministry.

A special forest Bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and C.K. Prasad directed the States and UTs to give effect to the various recommendations and guidelines framed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests in its March 2010 report, and submit compliance reports before the court within six months.

“Over the years, India’s rivers and riparian ecology have been badly affected by the alarming rate of unrestricted sand mining which damage the ecosystem of rivers and the safety of bridges, weakens river beds, destroys natural habitats of organisms living on the river beds, affects fish breeding and migration, spells disaster for the conservation of many bird species and increases saline water in the rivers,” said Justice Radhakrishnan, writing the judgment for the Bench.

The Supreme Court passed the directions while dealing with the auction notice issued by the Haryana government on June 3 and August 8 last year, and alleged illegal minings in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan.

The Bench also expressed surprise at the report submitted by the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) on January 4, 2012, in which no mention was made of illegal mining activities and the serious ecological dangers posed by it.

“The report, however, is silent with regard to the disturbing trend of serious illegal and unrestricted upstream, in-stream and flood plain sand mining activities and the prevailing degree of degradation of the sites and the environment, especially on the river beds mentioned earlier,” the Supreme Court said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.