No executive takeover of judicial appointments: govt.

Got assurance from Jaitley, says ex-CJI Khare

July 30, 2014 01:47 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:47 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

New Delhi:  28/07/2014: Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad with (L-R) Senior Advocate Shanti Bhushan, Former Attorney General J.Soli Sorabjee and Senior Advocate Fali Nariman during a Consultaion with Eminent Jurists on Reforms in the Judiciary in New Delhi on Monday,July 28, 2014.  Photo: R_V_Moorthy

New Delhi: 28/07/2014: Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad with (L-R) Senior Advocate Shanti Bhushan, Former Attorney General J.Soli Sorabjee and Senior Advocate Fali Nariman during a Consultaion with Eminent Jurists on Reforms in the Judiciary in New Delhi on Monday,July 28, 2014. Photo: R_V_Moorthy

Former Chief Justice of India V.N. Khare on Tuesday said Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, at a consultation held between the Law Ministry and eminent jurists on setting up a Judicial Appointments Commission, had promised that there would not be a repeat of the pre-collegium days in the judicial appointments process.

“Minister Arun Jaitley assured us in the meeting that the situation will not go back to the pre-collegium days,” Justice Khare, who participated in the meeting, told The Hindu .

The assurance is significant as it comes at a time when a strong difference of opinion is emerging among the participants of Monday’s meeting on who should dominate the Judicial Appointments Commission — the executive or the judiciary.

The BJP-led NDA government had tried to soothe matters with this assurance that no matter what, a replacement to the collegium system would not pave the way for an executive takeover of judicial appointments.

Justice Khare supports the “dominance” of the judiciary in the Judicial Appointments Commission. “We want judges to have dominance because they are acquainted with the working of the judges shortlisted for selection. Unlike persons from outside, who depend on IB reports, we [judges] keep a close watch on the work of the particular judges and often come across their judgments,” Justice Khare reasoned. But senior advocate K.T.S. Tulsi, one of the eminent jurists who participated in the consultations, said having a majority of judges in the commission would be old wine in a new bottle. It is “just collegium by another name.” Law Commission Chairperson Justice A.P. Shah also warned that the setting up of the commission in a cosmetic manner would “only change the circle of ‘high priests’, leaving untouched the mystique behind the ‘sacred ritual’ of appointments.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.