No coercive action against Taslima, SC tells U.P. police

U.P. cleric had filed a complaint against the author for a twitter comment

December 17, 2013 01:31 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 06:10 pm IST - New Delhi

Taslima Nasreen

Taslima Nasreen

Granting relief to Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen, the Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Uttar Pradesh police not to take any “coercive action” against her in connection with an FIR lodged by cleric Maulana Tauqeer Raza Khan alleging that her twitter comments insulted “religious” beliefs.

A Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and S.A. Bobde, after hearing senior counsel K.K. Venugopal issued notice to the State government seeking its response but made it clear it could not quash the FIR at this stage. In a brief order, the Bench said: “Issue notice. In the meantime, no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner.”

She wanted to quash the charges filed against her under the Information Technology Act for the controversial tweet criticising a meeting between Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal and the cleric .

“Seek police protection”

The Bench told Mr. Venugopal: “Our difficulty is we cannot quash the FIR and interfere with the investigation at this stage. We understand the threat to your life. You should apply for police protection. Why should we stop the investigation? The investigation cannot be stayed.”

Mr. Venugopal told the court that the fatwa issued against her in 2007 had not been withdrawn and she carried Rs. 5 lakh on her head. The fresh FIR would compel her to go to Bareilly, he said. But later the Bench issued notice and restrained the U.P. police from taking coercive steps against her.

In her writ petition, Ms. Nasreen said the entire FIR was based on a newspaper report on November 6 about the meeting Mr. Kejriwal had with Maulana Tauqueer Raza Khan. Her protest in twitter was in the specific context of a public announcement and fatwa issued against her in 2007.

She said the FIR was an abuse of the process of law. Further, Section 66A of the IT Act was so wide and vague that it was incapable of being judged on objective standards.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.