NHRC against “outsiders” taking up power repair

December 20, 2009 12:41 am | Updated 12:41 am IST - NEW DELHI

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has expressed its concern over the unlawful practice of engaging unauthorised persons for repair of transmission lines and ruled that it resulted in serious violation of human rights.

Taking up a specific case of a person who died of electrocution, the NHRC pulled up the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation for using one such person and slapped a monetary penalty of Rs. 3 lakh to be paid to the kin of the deceased.

The instant case

Taking cognisance of a complaint, the Commission enquired into the causes that led to the death of Ramadhar Yadav while repairing a 11 KV transmission line in Honhaich village in Uttar Pradesh on August 6, 2008.

The deceased’s son, Naubal Yadav, in his petition had charged that the junior engineer and linemen of the electricity department had engaged his father to repair transmission lines in the area of the Kotwa Sub-Station. He was electrocuted and fell from the electric pole. He was taken to hospital but could not be saved.

“He did it on his own”

In response to the Commission’s notice, the power corporation denied the charge, but the Superintendent of Police of Mau in his report admitted that Ramadhar Yadav had been used for repairing the transmission lines and during one such assignment he was electrocuted. The post-mortem report too confirmed the cause of the death as electrocution.

The power corporation maintained that the deceased had not been engaged to repair the transmission line and claimed that Ramadhar Yadav was not auththorised to climbe the pole and was not responsible for his death.

The NHRC shot down the corporation’s claim expressing its disbelief that he would have climbed the electric pole for repairing the transmission line on his own and ruled that he had fallen a victim to unlawful practice.

Noting that it “found outsiders are sometimes engaged in an unauthorised manner for repairs of transmission lines,” the Commission maintained that the practice resulted in serious violation of human rights of the victim. He stressed that such “hapless” workers were not only exposed to insecurity of life but also deprived of the benefits of labour laws.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.