New licensees were favoured at the cost of exchequer: CAG

At JPC, Manish Tewari asks him about the basis of reaching the loss figure

December 20, 2011 12:14 am | Updated November 17, 2021 12:03 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Comptroller and Auditor-General Vinod Rai on Monday defended before the JPC the CAG's findings on revenue loss in the 2G spectrum allocation in 2008. File photo

Comptroller and Auditor-General Vinod Rai on Monday defended before the JPC the CAG's findings on revenue loss in the 2G spectrum allocation in 2008. File photo

Comptroller and Auditor-General Vinod Rai on Monday defended before the Joint Parliamentary Committee the CAG's findings on revenue loss in the 2G spectrum allocation in 2008. He also said it was “not abnormal” for officers in the organisation to differ on various issues, including the pricing formula.

“The value which should have accrued to the public exchequer [from auction of 2G spectrum] went as a favour to new licensees in the form of huge capital infusion for enriching their business,” Mr. Rai reiterated at the hearing, which remained inconclusive.

In its report, the CAG had put the “presumptive loss” due to the allocation of scarce spectrum at between Rs. 57,000 crore and Rs.1.76-lakh crore (based on various theories).

According to informed sources, the CAG, who was questioned by Congress MP Manish Tewari, explained various basics for calculation of loss that included draft reports prepared by the Director-General (Post & Telegraph) and also infusion of capital by foreign companies into the newly-formed telecom firms which got licences in 2008.

While clarifying on the DG (P&T) draft report, where the loss was put at just Rs.2,645 crore based on the figure of Rs.1,651 crore (for a pan-India licence) and enhanced at the rate of cost inflation index of 2008 as against the 2001 prices, Mr. Rai pointed out that even the Finance Ministry said the pricing model was “not acceptable” and also that “the present regime of allotting spectrum free of charge fails to capture its scarcity value, yield monopoly results to operations and is clearly inefficient.”

The sources said Mr. Tewari asked Mr. Rai mainly about the basis of reaching the loss figure and why the lesser figures as mentioned by DG (P&T) were not considered.

This was the second time Mr. Rai appeared before the JPC, the earlier occasion being on November 15. The CAG will appear before the committee again on Tuesday when other MPs are likely to seek clarifications.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.