NCTC: Centre rejects Modi’s contention

June 05, 2013 05:00 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:45 pm IST - New Delhi

Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram shakes hand with Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh during the Chief Minister's Conference on internal security in New Delhi on Wednesday.

Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram shakes hand with Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh during the Chief Minister's Conference on internal security in New Delhi on Wednesday.

Rejecting Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s contention that NCTC is a “poorly conceived” idea, the Centre on Wednesday said the country will have to pay heavy price if the anti-terror hub does not come into existence.

The Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, the architect of the NCTC, said it was “deeply regrettable” that a few chief ministers opposed even the modified version of the National Counter Terrorism Centre.

“I am afraid, the kind of seriousness that we should give to NCTC, is lost. And I deeply regret that a couple of chief ministers opposed the NCTC even at the present modified version. If this NCTC is opposed, I am afraid, as I said, the country will pay price from time to time,” he told reporters after Mr. Modi’s criticism of NCTC at the Chief Ministers conference.

The Gujarat chief minister termed the NCTC as a “poorly conceived” idea which “tinkers” with old ideas rather than strengthening them.

Mr. Modi said the proposed structure of the NCTC is not in congruence with the principles of federalism as it essentially tries to create a “federal police” which is an alien concept to the country.

Mr. Chidambaram, who was present at the conference, said that had the central government brought NCTC along with amendment to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, National Investigation Agency Act and with the Multi Agency Centre in December 2008 after the 26/11 terror attack, it would have got approval of the states.

“Some chief ministers are talking about giving safeguards on NCTC. They are not opposing NCTC. I think opposing NCTC is unfortunate. I think it is wrong,” he said.

Mr. Chidambaram said the present form of the NCTC was a modified version and no Congress chief minister opposed it.

According to the February, 2012 executive order, which faced strong opposition from non-Congress chief ministers, the NCTC will work as an “integral” part of Intelligence Bureau and its director will report to the IB chief.

Besides, the anti-terror body was given ‘power’ through the executive order to carry out operations, including arrest, search and seizure, while keeping the state police concerned into the loop.

However, the latest draft of the NCTC said it will work directly under the Home Ministry and not the IB. Besides, when a terrorist or a terror group is identified or located, operations against them would be carried out through or in conjunction with state police.

“Where services of special forces are required to assist the state police for any operation, the NCTC shall have the authority to requisition the special forces,” the draft says.

Commenting on Mr. Modi’s statement that the country lacks a strong anti-terror law, Mr. Chidambaram said UPA has adequate provisions to deal with terror cases but what the country needed was instruments like NCTC to implement the law.

“One instrument is MAC. Today, The Chief Minister of Gujarat is praising MAC. MAC was operationalised by me after I took over (as Home Minister) in December 2008. That is one instrument. NIA is the second instrument. The third, and I maintain, the most important instrument, is NCTC.

“He (Modi) wants an anti-terror law or strengthening of anti-terror law. Actually he wants to bring back TADA and POTA. Why did not he say so...that I want POTA back. The Congress party is opposed to POTA, the UPA is opposed to POTA,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.