Must “crush” press freedom if it doesn’t help poor, says Katju

November 17, 2012 01:27 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:36 am IST - NEW DELHI:

There were two messages for the media on the occasion of National Press Day: the government clearly signalled a hands-off policy, even while the outspoken chief of the Press Council of India (PCI) warned that the freedom of the press must be “crushed” if it did not help raise the standard of living of the masses.

“As a country, we believe in complete independence of the media from external control,” said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in a message to the members of the press. “It is true that sometimes irresponsible journalism can have serious consequences for social harmony and public order, which the public authorities have an obligation to maintain, but censorship is no answer.”

Instead, the Prime Minister said it was for the press itself to “collectively ensure that objectivity is promoted and sensationalism is curbed” and to introspect how they could best serve the country.

On the other hand, PCI Chairman Justice Markandey Katju seemed to indicate that press freedom was conditional, depending on how the media did its job.

“Freedom of press is not an absolute right. The absolute right is the improvement of standard of living of the masses,” he said at a function held to mark National Press Day, which commemorates the establishment of the Press Council on November 16, 1956. “If freedom of press helps the improvement of standard of living of masses, then it’s a good thing. But if freedom of press lowers the standard of living of people, makes people poorer, then we must crush freedom of press.”

Justice Katju reiterated his long-running complaint that the media focussed too much on the latest Bollywood film or Tendulkar century, rather than unemployment or farmers’ suicides.

Speaking at the same event, Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari echoed the Prime Minister in emphasising need for self-regulation by the media itself. He made it clear that the government had no intention of acting as a “big brother” or policing the media.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.