News » National

Updated: March 2, 2012 10:07 IST

Move for normal trade ties with Pakistan hailed

Special Correspondent
Comment (5)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Union Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma.
The Hindu
Union Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma.

The move by the Pakistan Government to prune the negative list has received widespread applause from both sides of the border with the Central Government and India Inc welcoming the decision aimed at normalising trade relations between the two nations.

Confidence-building measure

However, there is a note of caution. Notifying the list will have to be accompanied by measures such as putting in place a liberal visa regime, opening of bank branches, enhancing road and rail communication, enabling operation of mobile phones on both sides and removing non-tariff barriers. Union Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma said it was one of the biggest confidence-building measures initiated to normalise relations between the two countries.

During his visit to Pakistan last month, Pakistan's Trade Minister Makhdoom Amin Fahim had assured him that a final decision in the matter would be taken by end-February.

“I am happy that this has been achieved,'' he said.

India-Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry President S. M. Muneer said that without the provision of banking services, opening of letters of credit, and cross-border transactions of funds, trade could not taken place. He urged both countries to remove non-tariff barriers. He said trade facilitation through expeditious border crossings, streamlining documentation requirements, border agency coordination, opening of new border crossings, quick customs clearance and electronic data interchange was required immediately.

Former President of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Nasser Hyatt Maggo, said India should now take the initiative to respond to the concerns of Pakistan businessmen. “It is time that a liberal visa regime is put in place. Rather than restrictions, both governments should help in facilitation of trade at the borders,'' Mr. Maggo added.

Federation of India Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) Secretary General Rajiv Kumar said, “This will not only normalise India-Pakistan bilateral trade but also pave way for much higher intra-regional trade within the SAARC region.''

“FICCI is especially satisfied with this development because it has been pursuing the cause of normalisation of India-Pakistan bilateral ties vigorously over the last one year,'' he added.

Win-win for both

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) said a majority of tradable items of both sides would be freely permissible which would be a clear win-win for both sides. “Pakistan can import raw material and finished goods from India at competitive prices and India can get benefit of the strength of the many sectors where Pakistan is strong,'' Sunil Kant Munjal, past President of CII, said.

It's a good decision and hope peace and developement prevails on both sides...

from:  Lingesh Hazare
Posted on: Mar 1, 2012 at 20:38 IST

I think that we should be careful with our step when it comes with
Pakistan. Pakistan has always breached our trust. So we must be cautious
with our step.

Posted on: Mar 1, 2012 at 19:59 IST

The hypocrisy and the anti-national nature, of the Indira congress party
is exposed.On the one hand it wants NCTC and on the other "trade" with
Pakistan, despite Kasab etc.The main aims:-
1.UP Elections
2.And the more dangerous :-converting, SAARC into a EU-clone for
ushering in One World Totalitarian Government.

from:  Sadasivan
Posted on: Mar 1, 2012 at 19:18 IST

Slowly and steadily break the barriers; do not be upset over the
political moves or the terrorists acts of destroying the stability of
both the countries. Most probably wiser and responsible minds will
create a most cohesive cultural, commercial and political relationship
among these two countries in phases.

from:  chandrasekaran
Posted on: Mar 1, 2012 at 17:03 IST

My opinion on this move is not positive. Government should have gone for a more strict punishment and penalty amount should have remained unchanged.

Given the high penalty amount, individuals will be discouraged to opt for a penalty and this would encourage nothing but corruption. If a person has to choose between 5000 fine or 1000 bribe one might not be upright in making the decision.. after all we are human beings.

Had it been a choice between 500 fine or 500 bribe, everyone would obviously go for the fine.

from:  Rajeev
Posted on: Mar 1, 2012 at 16:53 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Other States






Recent Article in National

India’s Under-14 girls football team stranded at Kathmandu

Fresh tremors shortly after Sunday noon delayed the evacuation of the Indian Under-14 girls football team from Kathmandu. The t... »