Today's Paper Archive Classifieds Subscriptions RSS Feeds Site Map ePaper Mobile Apps Social
SEARCH

News » National

Updated: November 23, 2009 14:20 IST

More flyovers not helping public transport users: Reddy

PTI
Share  ·   print   ·  

Building of more flyovers in cities were only aiding the personal car-owners, Urban Development Minister Jaipal Reddy on Monday said and maintained that the focus should be on expanding the new-age public transport systems like Metro and BRT.

“We are building flyovers (in cities) for cars only. Even buses can’t go. The two-wheelers cannot use them,” he told a national conference on ‘good governance towards improved basic urban service’ organised by TERI here.

He said the focus should be on urban public transport and that there is a need for expansion of Metro in Delhi and other cities of the country.

Mr. Reddy said apart from Metro, the ministry was looking at bus-based public transport and highlighted the importance of the Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) in which exclusive lanes are reserved for the buses. He said this was cheaper than the Metro and the people have also liked it.

The minister said that 15,250 low-floor semi-luxury buses have been introduced in 62 cities under the JNNURM.

“That is the only way to convince the aspiring urban middle classes to give up personal cars and go for public transport,” Mr. Reddy said adding that this will help save fuel, reduce traffic jams and pollution.

Noting that this will lead to better living in urban areas, Mr. Reddy said that more than 90 per cent of the funds under JNNURM, which is over Rs one lakh crore, has gone on improving basic services like drinking water, drainage, slum improvement and housing for the poor.

Kerala

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Tamil Nadu

The HIndu's in-depth coverage of agriculture

O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Lokpal appointment: Jaitley demands immediate stop to the attempt

Demanding an immediate stop to attempts to appoint a Lokpal, BJP on Sunday said it would be a “gross political impropriety” and “violatio... »