News » National

Updated: June 17, 2011 00:17 IST

Moily accuses Team Anna of disinformation campaign

Special Correspondent
Comment (3)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily. File photo
The Hindu
Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily. File photo

Asserting that there would be only one draft Lokpal Bill and not two, Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily on Thursday accused the team headed by Anna Hazare of indulging in a disinformation campaign on the deliberations of the civil society-government representatives of the joint committee to draft the legislation.

At a press conference here, Mr. Moily, who is the committee convener, charged the civil society members with coming up with a new version of the Bill at every meeting. “Every time they produce new things from their pocket and expect us to respond.”

They were demanding clauses which would necessitate constitutional amendments, while the mandate of the committee was to draft legislation.

Mr. Moily said the demand for inclusion of the conduct of MPs in Parliament was against the provisions of the Constitution. “When we seek clarifications, they maintain that they are not in favour of constitutional amendments and are seeking to draft legislation within the framework of the Constitution.”

“6 contentious points”

The Minister claimed that of the 40 specific points raised by them on the contours of the Bill, the government was in agreement with 34. “There are only six contentious points and the government is ready to sit down to negotiate on them.”

The government was in favour of bringing in a strong Lokpal Bill with the cooperation of civil society and would make another attempt on June 20 to sort out the differences. If necessary, there could be another session the following day.

The Minister said there was no final word yet on bringing the Prime Minister within the purview of the anti-corruption legislation and consultations within and outside the government on the subject were on.

However, he was not willing to spell out the stand of his Ministry or of the government on inclusion or exclusion of the Prime Minister within the ambit of the Bill on the plea that he could not speak on behalf of the government.

In the event of failure of the two sides to arrive at a consensus on the Bill, then their views on the contentious issues would be sent to the Cabinet.

“But there will be no two drafts,” Mr. Moily said, contradicting civil society representative Arvind Kejriwal's statement on Wednesday that two separate drafts — one prepared by the government representatives and the other by the civil society members — would be sent to the Cabinet.

The Minister accused the BJP and sections of civil society of obstructing the war launched by the UPA government on corruption and said it would not be distracted by such attempts.

He took exception to the comment by BJP president Nitin Gadkari that the promise by UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi to fight against corruption was to be taken as seriously as the resolve of Pakistan to root out terrorism.

“Mr. Gadkari is a pygmy in politics. This is what happens when a small-time politician occupies a high position in national politics. The BJP president is a miserable failure as was evident in the performance of his party in the recent elections in five States.”

More In: National | News

Henry Ford had once famously said that his customers can have any colour for their Ford car 'as long as it is black'. The 'take it or leave it' stand of the Central ministers in the Lokpal bill panel has the same purport as that of Ford's statement. These ministers do not seem to credit their compatriots with much intelligence.

from:  K.Vijayakumar
Posted on: Jun 17, 2011 at 16:37 IST

Mr Minister Please tell clearly we are very clear from civil society what they are saying but we are not clear from government side, so it is our request please say very clearly. One more thing, at the time BJP Government you(congress) opinion was different at that time congress also agree PM comes under the law but congress is not agree,why you are not discussing openly?

from:  Susanta Kumar Das
Posted on: Jun 17, 2011 at 16:35 IST

Mr. Minister needs to post the 34 out of 40 points that are accepted It's great. Further post them on law ministries portal. Also post the 6 points that cannot be agreed with the objections via minutes of your meetings before someone files for an RTI. My confusion is why government team members via different sessions talk everything other the issue itself while we see the Civil Society members stay put on the issues over the bill. We the people elected you to tell us and rather we the people are getting/being confused.

from:  Pavan Peechara
Posted on: Jun 17, 2011 at 12:39 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Other States






Recent Article in National

Civilians biggest casualty of Naxal violence

While left wing extremism (LWE) — the government's preferred phrase for Naxal-related violence — has caused over 20,000 deaths in the co... »