News » National

Updated: January 27, 2014 23:00 IST

Modi govt. abetted, pushed 2002 riots: Rahul

Comment (9)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Pitted against BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi in a virtual Presidential-style contest in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi said he was not scared of him and claimed that Congress will defeat BJP. File photo
The Hindu
Pitted against BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi in a virtual Presidential-style contest in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi said he was not scared of him and claimed that Congress will defeat BJP. File photo

The Narendra Modi government was responsible for “abetting and pushing” the 2002 Gujarat riots while the Congress government tried to stop the 1984 riots, Rahul Gandhi said on Monday but offered no apology for the anti-Sikh violence.

Pitted against Mr. Modi in a virtual Presidential-style contest in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, Mr. Gandhi said he was not scared of him and claimed that Congress will defeat BJP.

Making a direct attack on Mr. Modi, he said, “the fact of the matter is that innocent people died in 1984 and innocent people dying is a horrible thing and should not happen. The difference between Gujarat and 1984 was that the government of Gujarat was involved in the riots.”

Asked in an interview to a television channel as to how he could say that when Mr. Modi has been given a clean chit by the courts, Mr. Gandhi said, “... he was the Chief Minister when the Gujarat riots happened....The government in Gujarat was actually abetting and pushing the riots further.”

Seeking to differentiate the role of governments during the anti-Sikh riots in Delhi and 2002 in Gujarat, he said, “the simple difference is that in 1984, the government was not involved in the massacre of people. In Gujarat it was.”

He insisted that the Congress government in 1984 “was not aiding and abetting the riots” but had tried to stop the violence.

When pressed further on how he could attack Mr. Modi on the Gujarat riots, Mr. Gandhi said, “it is not me. It is a large number of people who saw actively the government of Gujarat being involved in the riots.

“I mean, people saw it. I am not the person who saw it. Your colleagues saw it. Your colleagues told me. They saw the administration actively attacking the minorities.”

To questions whether he would apologise for the 1984 riots and whether he felt that there was no need for it, Mr. Gandhi said, “First of all, I wasn’t involved in the riots at all. It wasn’t that I was a part of it.”

At the same time, he admitted that “some Congress men were probably involved in 1984 anti-Sikh riots and they have been punished for it”.

When asked if he agreed with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s view that Mr. Modi presided over the “mass massacre” of innocents on the streets of Ahmedabad, Mr. Gandhi said, “What the Prime Minister is saying is the fact. Gujarat happened and people died.”

Asked if he was avoiding a direct face-off with Mr. Modi by not becoming the Prime Ministerial candidate of the Congress, the Congress vice-president said, “to understand that question, you have to understand a little bit, who Rahul Gandhi is and you get an answer to the question to what Rahul Gandhi is scared of and not scared of.”

To a question as to what was his view of BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, he said, “I think, we will defeat the BJP in the next elections....I will win the election. I am reasonably confident.”

He added that Congress was “battle ready” and “going to win”.

Asked if he would take responsibility if Congress doesn’t win the election, he said, “If we don’t win, I am the Vice President of the party. I will take responsibility.”

On naming Mr. Modi as prime ministerial candidate, he said, “BJP believes in concentration of power in one person. I fundamentally disagree with that. I believe in democracy. I believe in opening of the system.... We have fundamentally different philosophies.”

The questioner said Rahul Gandhi has avoided the whole question about whether he was open to Prime Minister’s post and avoiding a difficult contest.

In reply, Mr. Gandhi referred to his speech at the AICC meet and said announcing a PM candidate before an election is “announcing your Prime Minister without asking your MPs. It is not actually written in the Constitution.”

He avoided direct reply to questions on whether political parties should be brought under the purview of RTI, saying Parliament should decide on it if political parties are unanimous on this. “My position is that the more openness, the better.”

Asked why Congress protected former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan despite a judicial commission’s indictment, Mr. Gandhi said the party had taken action wherever corruption was involved.

While speaking to Times Now, he said he made his position clear on Mr. Chavan after the Maharashtra Cabinet had rejected the judicial commission’s findings.

On corruption charges against Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh, he said, “there is a legal process. Follow it and conclude it.”

With regard to performance by Aam Aadmi Party, he said, “there are things how they have reached out to people. Don’t take that away from them.”

To questions about dynasty politics, Mr. Gandhi said he said he is “absolutely against the concept of dynasty. But it happens in BJP, SP, DMK and Congress everywhere.”

He said he was being personally attacked because he is doing things that are dangerous to the system.

More In: National | News

this is the worst phase in politics.. where every party is trying to be
stable either by hook or crook.. if someone really deserve to be in the
government then its congress, one cannot deny the fact that they
contributed a very big part in the development of our country..

from:  trisha
Posted on: Jan 28, 2014 at 13:26 IST

What BJP has done for us when they were in power? congress retrieved us
from two recessions.but once BJP lost the elections they could not even
made a comeback from last 10 years...

from:  javit
Posted on: Jan 28, 2014 at 13:25 IST

one cannot deny the fact that the nation has moved ahead in terms of good
and transparent governance under the flag of UPA and leadership of the
prime minister and of course Sonia Gandhi. Without going into minute
details, just look at few things like RTI act, RTE act, and MNREGA. These
three are milestones. Just think that before these acts came into force,
ever any Indian had such things in mind before. I feel Congress as single
national party needs to come back and they will be...................

from:  sheena
Posted on: Jan 28, 2014 at 13:19 IST

If Hindu had published verbatim of the interview, true personality
would have come out, which I am sorry to say is not great. The
columnist is rather soft (if not biased) in presenting the interview.
In the first 50-60 mins Rahul Gandhi was more like reciting out of a
script unable to answer and repeating two or three items (Youth &
Women empowerment) over and again. Even when questioned about Modi
getting clean chit from courts, he says People saw it differently.
While questioned about corruption in Congress Governments (both at
centre and states) he says legal system will act on that. Very
straight forward for intellectuals like Rahul, but hypocrisy to a
simple minded people.

from:  Vikky
Posted on: Jan 28, 2014 at 04:55 IST

I don't understand the need for sensationalism in the title to this
article. Also, going by what is being said on social media, the
interview hardly projected Rahul Gandhi in such a positive light as the
article has.

Comparing this interview to the US presidential debate is blasphemy to
say the least.

from:  Rakesh
Posted on: Jan 28, 2014 at 00:21 IST

Only The Hindu regards Rahul Gandhi as a virtual PM Candidate in opposition to Narendra Modi and he will remain virtual and not real.

from:  Val
Posted on: Jan 27, 2014 at 23:54 IST

The answers are very amateurish. Rahul may be capable in other areas. He deserves a training on answering questions from media.

from:  Rajesh
Posted on: Jan 27, 2014 at 23:34 IST

just want to get focus and showing that he is also in context...good try for nothing

from:  pankaj
Posted on: Jan 27, 2014 at 23:16 IST

Congress is not willing to take the blame for the anti sikh riots led by congress after assasination of Mrs.Indra Gandhi, where innocent sikhs were brutually murdered by congressmen led by its leaders? If 2002 riots were led by Gujuarat government, then did Chinese or American government led anti sikh riots in India?

Congress has nothing to show the people and get votes, so it is involving in cheap divisive politics. Both the riots were because of people divided by religion and politics by these leaders. These leaders wont let people to be united so that they can enjoy the fruits of power.

Dear fellow country men. Its time to wake up.

from:  Dharani
Posted on: Jan 27, 2014 at 23:15 IST
Show all comments
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Other States






Recent Article in National

LCA delivery way behind schedule: IAF

HAL has been asked to get cracking, says Defence Secretary »