“Last request for extradition made in 2008”

June 10, 2010 01:03 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:10 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

FILE - In this Dec. 10, 1984 file photo, Warren Anderson, the head of Union Carbide Corp. at the time of the gas leak from its plant in Bhopal in India, speaks in Danbury, Conn. An Indian court on Monday, June 7, 2010 convicted seven former senior employees of Union Carbide's Indian subsidiary, not including Anderson, of "death by negligence" for their roles in the Bhopal gas tragedy that left an estimated 15,000 people dead more than a quarter century ago. (AP Photo/Ron Frehm, File)

FILE - In this Dec. 10, 1984 file photo, Warren Anderson, the head of Union Carbide Corp. at the time of the gas leak from its plant in Bhopal in India, speaks in Danbury, Conn. An Indian court on Monday, June 7, 2010 convicted seven former senior employees of Union Carbide's Indian subsidiary, not including Anderson, of "death by negligence" for their roles in the Bhopal gas tragedy that left an estimated 15,000 people dead more than a quarter century ago. (AP Photo/Ron Frehm, File)

India stopped making requests to the U.S. for extradition of the former Union Carbide chief, Warren Anderson, two years ago following the investigating agencies' inability to provide additional evidence sought by Washington, official sources said here on Wednesday.

The admission comes against the backdrop of Law Minister Veerappa Moily's statement that the case against Mr. Anderson was not over and he could still be tried in the country. “No. Legally and technically we can't say it. The case against him is still on … he can be obtained. He can still be tried,” Mr. Moily said on Tuesday.

The sources said the request for extradition was renewed a number of times and when Ambassador Ronen Sen forwarded the last request in September 2008, the U.S. responded by pointing out that the letter did not meet the relevant provisions of the India-U.S. Extradition Treaty.

The Ministry of External Affairs had been requesting the investigating agencies to give the needful additional information that would enable it to press its extradition request with greater vigour. While ruling out a review of the Treaty, the sources said, “the U.S. has said sufficient evidence has to be provided. That is where the matter ends.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.