Unruly scenes mar Kerala Assembly proceedings

February 08, 2011 01:30 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 03:45 am IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The smouldering ice cream parlour case returned to the Kerala Assembly in a big way on Tuesday with CPI(M) and Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) members taking on each other over the issue, forcing adjournment of the House for over half-an-hour.

The angry exchange between the two sides which, for a brief while appeared likely to get out of hand, took place when IUML members Abdurahiman Randathani and K. Muhammedunni Haji took objection to CPI(M) member K. K. Shylaja’s reference to former Industries Minister P.K. Kunhalikkutty in connection with the ice cream parlour case.

This enraged V. Sivan Kutty, sitting next to Ms. Shyalaja. The heated exchanges between him and the IUML members soon culminated in his moving towards the Opposition benches, closely followed by his party colleague Babu M. Palissery.

With the IUML members also moving out of their seats, the situation appeared ripe for a physical exchange. However, Port and Youth Affairs Minister V. Surendran Pillai jumped between the two sides averting any such eventuality.

Deputy Speaker Jose Baby’s appeals for calm fell on deaf ears as more members from both the sides began converging at the scene of action.

Speaker K. Radhakrishnan, who rushed back to the House on hearing the commotion, immediately announced adjournment of the House. He later held discussions with party leaders on both the sides and expunged Ms. Shyalaja’s contentious observation on Mr. Kunhalikkutty when the House resumed its sitting. He also advised the members to observe parliamentary decorum and reminded them that spats did not behove good parliamentary behaviour.

Later, replying to Ms. Shyalaja’s call attention motion on the issue, Home Minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan said that the government had already swung into action in the light of revelations made by a relative of Mr. Kunhalikkutty and the media about the way the ice cream parlour case was sought to be scuttled through payment of huge sums of money and by influencing judges.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.