Temple case: amicus curiae to submit report in 10 days

September 30, 2012 03:00 am | Updated July 05, 2016 09:10 am IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM:

Gopal Subramaniam, the amicus curiae appointed by the apexcourt in the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple case, and the head of thesupervisory committee in the case M.N. Krishnan arriving at the temple onSaturday morning. Representative of the ruling family of erstwhile TravancoreAditya Varma and chairman of the expert committee inventorying the templevaults M.V. Nair are seen.  Photo:S.Gopakumar

Gopal Subramaniam, the amicus curiae appointed by the apexcourt in the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple case, and the head of thesupervisory committee in the case M.N. Krishnan arriving at the temple onSaturday morning. Representative of the ruling family of erstwhile TravancoreAditya Varma and chairman of the expert committee inventorying the templevaults M.V. Nair are seen. Photo:S.Gopakumar

The amicus curiae appointed by the Supreme Court in the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple case, Gopal Subramaniam, will submit a situation- report on the ongoing inventorying of the temple vaults and other related aspects to the court in 10 days.

Speaking to journalists here on Saturday, Mr. Subramaniam said the judges of the Supreme Court hearing the case were “deeply concerned with preserving the heritage of the temple.”

Consequent to meetings with parties to the case and visits to the temple, he was able to gather a lot of material, including “foundational material” about the temple.

The preservation and restoration of the temple would be the prime objective.

He said, “I hope my work will help in preservation of the temple and ensure that its glory is sacredly protected. I have a lot of work to do and little time.”

Mr. Subramaniam said he was able to see the process of inventorying of the vaults’ contents. The Supreme Court had chosen very able people for this work.

“I feel humbled by their work,” he noted.

He was able to see a sense of positivism among these experts. He did not give a direct reply when asked whether he went inside the temple vaults.

Anyone with a petition or a grievance was given time to see him, he noted.

Asked whether he was satisfied with the security at the temple, he said he was able to see part of the security apparatus surrounding the temple. Security personnel had been duly sensitised to the nature of their work. Based on discussions with police personnel, he would make additional suggestions for improving the security in his report to the Supreme Court.

“Many years ago I came to the temple with my mother and father. So, visiting the temple was also a personal experience for me,” he added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.